Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

R v R (Divorce: Jurisdiction: Domicile)

Cited authorities 2 Cited in 4 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2005
Year2005
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Z v Z (Divorce: Jurisdiction)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • To Also Known As Tt v Ko
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 22 de outubro de 2021
    ...denied by the Husband. Parties cannot confer jurisdiction on a court by consent. As was held in R v R (Divorce: Jurisdiction: Domicile) [2006] 1 FLR 389 at para.6, ‘domicile isdecided by applying the law to the facts … a question of jurisdictionbased on the application of law cannot be comp......
  • W 對 C
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 21 de março de 2013
    ...23. 本離婚程序並沒有提出《婚姻訴訟條例》第3條任何其他理由，導致香港法庭有司法管轄權。雖然“妻子”在呈請曾聲稱有，而“丈夫”亦沒有反對，但對這事都沒有關係。訴訟雙方不能基於同意而賜予司法管轄權。正如R v R [2006] 1 FLR 389第6段所述，“決定居籍，是把法律應用於事實…基於應用法律的司法管轄權議題，並不能夠被妥協的”。 24. 25. 本庭亦需要宣佈，暫准離婚令，...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT