R v Recorder of Leicester
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1946 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
R v Ashford, Kent, Justices. ex parte Richley (No. 2)
...has been brought up and quashed in certain circumstances, and no-one doubts that it can be done. The last is the case of The King v. The Recorder of Leicester, 1947 King's Bench, page 727, where the respondent in affiliation proceedings, against whom an order had been made by Justices, appe......
-
R Ats. Thorpe v Molyneaux
...in Elliott v. Elliott and was therefore not before them when they considered their decision. 75 R. v. Leicester Recorder, ex parte Wood [1947] K.B. 726 ; [1947] 1 All E.R. 928 saw another exception to the Quarter Sessions rule, already established in R. v. Gaunt (supra) (which was not cit......
-
R v Diggines, ex parte Rahmani
...of tribunals that had themselves been at fault. It has been followed in such cases of perjury in affilitation proceedings as R. v. Recorder of Leicester, [1947] King's Bench 726; R. v. Ashford Kent Justices Ex parte Richley (No. 2), [1956] 1 Queen's Bench 167 and R. (Burns) v. County Cour......
-
R v West Sussex Quarter Sessions, ex parte Albert and Maud Johnson Trust Ltd
...be brought up and will quash It, see The Queen v. Gillyard (1848) 12 Q. B. 527. So also if a party has been guilty of perjury, see Rex v. Recorder of Leicester (1947) K.3. 726: or if one of the witnesses has committed perjury, see R. v. Tyrone County Court Judge (1961) N. I. 167. 30 Hither......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...2) (2004), 60 N.S.W.L.R. 454 ......................................................... 159 R. v. Recorder of Leicester, Ex parte Wood, [1947] K.B. 726, [1947] 1 All E.R. 928 ...........................................................................................175, 178, 181 R. v. Richar......