R v Richardson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1863
Date01 January 1863
CourtAssizes

English Reports Citation: 176 E.R. 318

Nisi Prius

Regina
and
Richardson

Referred to, Marks v. Beyfus, 25 Q. B. D. 495.

[693] Sussex Spring Assizes, 1863, Lewes, coram Cockburn, C J regina v rk hardson. (On an indictment for administering poison with intent to murder ; the police having, in consequence of certain information, found the bottle containing the poison in a place used by the prisoner held, that they were bound to disclose from whom they had the information ) [Referred to, Marks v Beyfus, 25 Q. B D 495 ] The prisoner was indicted for administering a certain poison, called corrosive sublimate, to Wm. H Halsted and Martha Halsted, with intent to murder them, &c Roupell for the prosecution Efeirrow for the defence From the evidence for the prosecution, it appeared that the prisoner was the domestic servant of the prosecutor and his wife, and that there was no one else but herself and them in the house at the time, and that, on the day in question, she had draiwn and brought up to table some beer for their dinner In that beer was found a quantity of corrosive sublimate, while other beer which she had drawn from the same cask for her own dinner was perfectly free from it ò so that it was clear the poUon must have been, either by accident or design, m the jug in which she had drawn the beer for her master and mistress She was questioned as to the matter, and her answers at the time seemed satisfactory About three weeks afterwards, however, some communication was made to the police, upon which they searched the servant's priyy, used only by the prisoner, and in the soil was found a phial containing a small quantity of liquid, containing corrosive sublimate. At the trial the policeman was asked from whom he received the information alluded to, when he replied, as he had previously done before the magistrates, and so statjed in the depositions, that he and all the West Sussex police received printed instructions, amongst which was one forbidding them to name persons from whom anv* information was received, and he therefore refused to say who were [694] his informants, unless ordered to do so by his superintendent (6) la] It is an incident of a common trading...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • S v Safatsa and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...All ER 1169 (HL); Sankey v Whitlam and Others (1979) 53 B ALJR 11 at 21 - 4, 28; Baker v Campbell (1984) 49 ALR 385 at 395; R v Richardson 3 F & F 693 (176 ER 318); R v Barton [1972] 2 All ER 1192; Wigmore on Evidence vol 8 paras 2291, 2292; Glanville Williams Textbook of Criminal Law (1978......
  • Attorney General v Simpson
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 9 December 1959
    ...190. (5) Crimes Act Cases 244. (6) 22 Cr. App. R. 58. (7) 37 Cr. App. R. 51. (8) 24 Howell's St. Tr. 199. (9) 32 Howell's St Tr. 1. (10) 3 F. & F. 693. (11) 1 Cox C. C. 365. (12) 2 Starkie 183. (13) 1 Holt 299. (14) 1 F. & F. 419. (15) 8 L. R. Q. B. 272. (16) 15 D. 292. (17) 18 R. 244. (18)......
  • Regina v William Taupa ToVarula and Others [1973] PNGLR 140
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 June 1972
    ...from an article which was referred to this morning in 1959 Criminal Law Review that a case is cited of R v Richardson (1863) 3 F & F 693; 176 ER 318, a case apparently decided by Chief Justice Cockburn in 1863, in which the name of the informant was ordered to be given. I am inclined to thi......
  • Australian Securities & Investment Commission v P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 4 July 2008
    ...in a particular case justice requires that the identity of a police informant should be disclosed: R v Richardson (1863) 3 F & F 693; 176 ER 318; Marks v Beyfus (at 25 In Jarvie v The Magistrates’ Court of Victoria at Brunswick [1995] 1 VR 84 at 91, which involved a closely analogous claim ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Die aanbrengersprivilegie in die konteks van Grondwetlike regte: Enkele beskouings
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...4 SA 619 (D) 73B—C was Fannin R tevrede dat daar op die feite van die saak nie aan (iv) voldoen is nie. 26 Cockburn HR in R v Richardson 3 F & F 693 (soos aangehaal met goedkeuring deur Watermeyer HR in Ex parte Minister of Justice: in re R v Pillay supra 665). 27 Ex parte Minister of Justi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT