R v Rochdale MBC, ex parte Milne (No.1)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2000 |
Year | 2000 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
- Blackpool Council v Howitt
-
R Susan Suliman v Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council
... ... 43 In R v Rochdale M.B.C, Ex P. Tew and Others [2000] Env LR 1 , Sullivan ... alteration” principle in R v Coventry CC ex parte Arrowcroft Group plc [2001] PLCR 7 , and noted that it ... ...
-
Arsenal Football Club Plc v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (First Defendant) Islington London Borough Council (Second Defendant)
...to which the greater weight is required to be given. Ouseley J derived this proposition in turn from the dictum of Sullivan J in R v Rochdale MBC ex parte Milne [2000] EWHC 650 (Admin) at [47]–[50]. (See also London Borough of Islington v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Governm......
-
R (oao Skelmersdale Ltd Partnership) v West Lancashire Borough Council St Modwen Developments (Skelmersdale) Ltd (Interested Party)
...(see Pedgrift v Oxfordshire CC [1991] 63 P & CR 246). 25 Conditions which are not enforceable in practical terms are unlawful (see R v Rochdale MBC, ex parte Milne (No 1) [2000] Env LR 1 (Sullivan J), but those which are merely difficult to enforce are not (see Bromsgrove DC v SSE [1988] J......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
A comparative analysis of environmental impact assessment law and planning practice in the Commonwealth Caribbean
...the insertion after s.l1(1) of s.11(lA). 15 R.v. Northampton B.C. ex parte Rice * Co. [1999) Env. L.R. D9; R. v. Rochedale ex parte Tew [2000] Env. L.R. 1 with respect to any project. The adoption of such a system would avoid the unnecessary costs and delays associated with the normal requi......