R v Satnam S
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1983 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Banditt v R
...3rd ed (2004) at 55. 35 [2004] 1 AC 1034 at 1065; cf R v Kitchener (1993) 29 NSWLR 696 at 703. 36 [2004] 1 AC 1034 at 1065. 37 (1983) 78 Cr App Rep 149 at 154. 39 [1968] VR 257 . 40 See Director of Public Prosecutions (NT) v WJI (2004) 219 CLR 43. 41 (1976) 136 CLR 62 at 77. See also Green ......
-
R v Taylor (Robert)
......Accordingly this Court held that the learned Judge should in those circumstances have given the suggested direction. . 21 Finally the case of Satnam and Kewal (1984 78 Cr. App. E. 149 was cited. In that case the Crown had conceded the Judge was in error in not giving the direction, and accordingly, apart from a brief reference to the decision in Thomas, the Court gave no reason for this part of their decision. . 22 In this ......
-
R v Thomas
......In our opinion there is no merit in Grounds 1(a) and 1(b) of — the Grounds of Appeal. . 25 The decision of the English Court of Appeal in R. v. Satnam & Kewal (1984) 78 Cr. App. R. 149 is illustrative of the way the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 1976, (U.K.) works. That Amending Act gave statutory recognition of the decision in D.P.P. v. Morgan (1975) 61 Cr. App. R. 136 . The statute declares, that if at a trial for a rape offence the Jury ......
-
Hksar v Li Kim Ching
...[1975] 61 Cr App R 136. 40. As Bristow J explained, when delivering the judgment of the English Court of Appeal in R v Satnam and Kewal 78 Cr App R 149 at 153, the purpose of subsections (1) and (2) of section 1 of the 1976 Act was to clarify the law governing intention in rape cases. Secti......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Recklessness—The Continuing Search for a Definition
...Cr App R 335; R vGardiner [1994] Crim LR 455; and R vAdkins [2000] 2 All ER 69. Power notes thatthe decision in R v Satnam and Kewal (1983) 78 Cr App R 149 seems at odds withthese decisions.106 Power, above n. 104 at 386–8, noting that the indifference element is from LordCross in DPP v Mor......
-
Lawmakers, Law Lords and Legal Fault: Two Tales from the (Thames) River Bank: Sexual Offences Act 2003; R v G and Another
...speech wasintended to throw any doubt on Lawrence and Reid.58 [2003] 4 All ER 765 at 785.59 Rv Pigg [1982] 2 All ER 591; Rv Satnam S (1983) 78 Cr App Rep 149; R v Thomas(1983) 77 Cr App Rep 63.60 [2003] 4 All ER 765 at 786.61 Rv Briggs [1977] 1 WLR 605; Rv Parker [1977] 1 WLR 600 and Rv Ste......
-
Ten years on
...Law Commission, Consent inSex Offences (HMSO: London, 2000) at para. 5.40.20. DPP vMorgan [1976] AC 182, HL and Satnam and Kewal (1984) 78 Cr. App. R 149, CA. Simon Gardner argues that Satnamextends liability to the situation when D failed to turn his mind to C’s consent at all, which he su......