R v Searle
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1971 |
| Year | 1971 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
- Public Prosecutor v Saiful Fazali Zulkifli
- Muhamad Nasir bin Shaharuddin and Another; PP
-
Skoog v R
...applied. (8) R. v. Conway, [1994] Crim. L.R. 826, applied. (9) R. v. McNamara, [1998] Crim. L.R. 278, considered. (10) R. v. Searle, [1971] Crim. L.R. 592; (1971), 115 Sol. Jo. 739, applied. (11) R. v. Souter, [1971] 1 W.L.R. 1187; [1971] 2 All E.R. 1151; (1971), 55 Cr. App. R. 403, referre......
- Public Prosecutor v Azman bin Ismail
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
“Possession” in the Digital Age: The Same Old Story Applied in the Modern Day: R v Cyprian Okoro (No. 3) [2018] EWCA Crim 1929; [2019] 1 Cr App R 2
...tothe controlled substances as a ‘common pool from which all had the right to draw’ (see Lord Widgery CJCase Note 177 in R v Searle [1971] Crim LR 592). In a digital sense, however, this phrase is no doubt broader and mayencompass such things as the ability to organise, relocate, recall, de......