R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Ram

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Judgment Date1979
Date1979
Year1979

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
23 cases
  • Marissa Cantos Musico v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 October 2020
    ...in order to enable her to regularise her immigration status. That, he submitted, followed from the decision in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Ram [1979] 1 W.L.R. 148. In those circumstances, the appellant should be treated as a person who had leave to remain when sh......
  • R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Coomasaru
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 October 1982
    ... ... , it should be explained that his proper course is to apply to the Home Office for variation of his leave, and that he will have a right of appeal ... or rule 70 involves a very serious misrepresentation by the Secretary of State. I prefer to accept the former alternative ... 10 ... He relies on Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Ram (1979) 1 Weekly Law Reports 148. That case was, if I may say ... ...
  • Rubab M. Gowa and Others (Applicants v Attorney General (Respondent
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 December 1984
    ...had he any power to recognise it, for at that time the applicants did not have that status". 73 In relation to R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Ram, [1979] 1 Weekly Law Reports 148, he said: "The judgment showed that the court regarded the Immigration Officer as ha......
  • Chan Mei Yee v Director Of Immigration
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 13 July 2000
    ...an immigrant, given a leave by mistake, is allowed to keep it." 75. In R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Ram, [1979] 1 All ER 687, the applicant arrived in the United Kingdom on an Indian passport on 27 February 1977. At the airport, he was given leave by the immigr......
  • Get Started for Free