R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Tarrant

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Judgment Date1984
Year1984
Date1984

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
102 cases
  • Kok Seng Chong v Bukit Turf Club and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 9 December 1992
    ...to be afforded in any particular case depended on the circumstances of that case. The six factors set out by Webster J in Ex p Tarrant [1985] QB 251[1984] 1 All ER 799[1984] 2 WLR 613 were expressly approved.The present English position is set out succinctly in 1(1) Halsbury`s Laws of Engla......
  • Burns and Another v Governor of Castlerea Prison
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 2 April 2009
    ...PRISON (DISCIPLINARY CODE FOR OFFICERS) RULES 1996 SI 289/1996 REG 8(2) R v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPT, EX PARTE TARRANT (JAMES) 1985 QB 251 1984 2 WLR 613 1984 1 AER 799 GARVEY v MIN FOR JUSTICE & GOVERNOR OF MOUNTJOY PRISON UNREP O CAOIMH 5.12.2003 2003/23/5303 CURLEY v GOVERNOR......
  • R v Board of Visitors of HM Prison, The Maze, ex parte Hone
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 January 1988
    ...should as of right be entitled to be represented by solicitors or counsel or both." 21 Subsequently, in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Tarrant [1985] Q.B. 251, a Divisional Court (consisting of Kerr L.J. and Webster J.) accepted Fraser v. Mudge as binding autho......
  • Prendergast v Commissioner of Police
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 17 November 1989
    ...v. Greyhound Racing Assn. Ltd. (No. 2), [1970] 1 Q.B. 46; [1969] 2 All E.R. 221, distinguished. (6) R. v. Home Secy., ex p. Tarrant, [1985] 1 Q.B. 251; [1984] 1 All E.R. 799, dicta of Webster and Kerr, JJ. applied. (7) University of Ceylon v. Fernando, [1960] 1 W.L.R. 223; [1960] 1 All E.R.......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Judicial Review of Prison Governor's Disciplinary Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 61-4, October 1988
    • 1 October 1988
    ...ex parte London ElectricityJointCommittee Co. (1920) Ltd [1924] I K.B.l7I,Rv. SecretaryofState for the HomeDepartment, ex parte Tarrant [1985] Q.B. 251; Raymond v. Honey [1983] A.C.8. [1983]A.C. 237: see Lord Diplock's judgment9. The House of Lords pronouncement in O'Reilly on the subject w......
  • McKelvey v Iarnród Éireann [2019] IESC 79
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 19-2020, January 2020
    • 1 January 2020
    ...question was whether there were exceptional circumstances which would mean that legal representation 4 [2009] 3 IR 682. 5 ibid [13]. 6 [1985] 1 QB 251. 7 R v Home Secretary ex parte, Tarrant (n 6) 285–286. 156 siobhán lafferty would be required. Irvine J did not consider that there were any......
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 66-1, February 2002
    • 1 February 2002
    ...RvSecretaryof State for theHomeDepartment, ex p. Tarrant [1985] 1 QB 251). Gwasfoundguiltyandgiven apenaltyof 21 additionaldays'imprisonment.Fourissues arose inthepresentcase:1.WhetherCandA-Hcouldrely ontheHumanRights Act 1998eventhoughthesubstanceoftheircomplaintoccurredbeforethatActcamein......