R v Secretary of State for Health and Trent Regional Health Authority, ex parte Guirguis

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1990
Year1990
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Skidmore v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 May 2003
    ...rejected the appeal on the basis that he had no jurisdiction in accordance with the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Secretary of State for Health, Ex p Guirguis [1990] IRLR 30, as Mr Skidmore had been dismissed without notice. IV. THE PROCEEDINGS ALLEGING UNFAIR 9 Mr Skidmore than a......
  • Dhasmana, R v Secretary of State for Health and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 February 2001
    ...to refer to the decision of this court in R v Secretary of State for Health and Trent Regional Health Authority, ex parte Guirguis [1990] IRLR 30, to which of course the Secretary of State referred in his decision letter. In that case the court had to consider paragraph 190. The facts discl......
  • Skidmore v. Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust, [2003] N.R. Uned. 178
    • Canada
    • 22 May 2003
    ...that he had no jurisdiction in accordance with the decision of the Court of Appeal in R. v. Secretary of State for Health, Ex p. Guirguis [1990] IRLR 30, as Mr. Skidmore had been dismissed without notice. IV. THE PROCEEDINGS ALLEGING UNFAIR DISMISSAL. [9] Mr. Skidmore than applied to an ind......
  • Janardan Prasad Dhasmana Secretary of State for Health (Respondent) United Bristol Healthcare Nhs Trust (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 24 November 2000
    ...to which I have been referred, and that is R v Secretary of State for Health and Trent Regional Health Authority, ex parte Guirguis [1990] IRLR 30. That was a case that dealt not with the situation in the present case but summary dismissal. That case clearly decided that paragraph 190 was n......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT