R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Zamir
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1979 |
| Date | 1979 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
36 cases
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja
...one ground on which counsel for Khera sought to distinguish his case from that of Zamir v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1980] A.C. 930, to which I shall refer in what follows. In Zamir the appellant had married after he had been given entry clearance and the deception whic......
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Mangoo Khan
...stated, I do not accept this. So far as the facts of this case are concerned, they are significantly different from Zamir's case (1979) 3 Weekly Law Reports 89paragraph 16(2) of Schedule 2 of the Immigration Act 1971. At the same time his wife was refused leave to enter. She lodged an appe......
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja
...or non-disclosure—it is clear that he is an "illegal entrant" and can be deported. If he wishes to appeal, he must do it from overseas, see Zamir's case (1980) Appeal Cases 15The present case is different, says Mr. Kadri. Because Mr. S.K. obtained a limited leave to enter. It was for one mo......
-
R (A) v Croydon London Borough Council
...speech of Lord Scarman, to which all counsel primarily took me, he examined the House's previous decision in R v. SSHD, ex parte Zamir [1980] AC 930. At page 107 Lord Scarman set out the three propositions of law enunciated by the House in Zamir– see letters A to C. At page 108 B Lord Scarm......
Get Started for Free