R v Seelig ; R v Lord Spens

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date02 May 1991
Date02 May 1991
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • R v Bayliss
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 16 Marzo 1993
    ... ... The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Neill, Mr Justice Tudor Evans and Mr Justice Clarke) so held on February 19 in dismissing ... ...
  • Re Jeffrey S Levitt Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 29 Octubre 1991
  • Re London United Investments Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 Diciembre 1992
    ...J. in R. v. Harris [1970] 1 W.L.R. 1252 and by the criminal division of this court (Watkins L.J. and Alliott and Cresswell JJ.) in R. v. Seelig [1991] 4 All E.R. 429, approving statements of law by Henry J. in the court below. 53 It has been drawn to our attention that in In re Perqamon Pre......
  • R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 Noviembre 2002
    ...as far as this court is concerned, by the decision given on 9 May 1991 by another division of this court presided over by Watkins LJ in R v Seelig [(1992) 94 Cr App R 17]" Mr Seelig was a defendant charged with offences, also arising out of the Guinness takeover of Distillers, whose trial h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Defining Fraud: An Argument in Favour of a General Offence of Fraud
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 4-4, February 1997
    • 1 Febrero 1997
    ...(1985) QB 829. R ν Nadir (1993) 4 All ER 513. R ν Saunders, Ronson & Parnes (1991) The Independent, 16th May, 1991. R v Seelig & Spens (1991) 4 All ER 429. R v Thorne (1977) 66 Cr. App R 6 R ν Virani (1994) unreported. R ν Wan Yu-Tsang (1991) 3 WLR 1006. Re Arrows (1992) 2 WLR 923. Re Londo......
  • Defining the Limits of the Common-Law, South African and European Privilege against Self-Incrimination
    • South Africa
    • Stellenbosch Law Review No. , August 2019
    • 16 Agosto 2019
    ...y, or to contradict incon sistent testimony at s ubsequent crim inal proceedi ngs; but see Kansal v UK (2004) 39 EHRR 3181 R v Seelig (1992) 94 Cr App R 17 and R v Saun ders (1996) 1 Cr App R 463172 STELL LR 2014 1 © Juta and Company (Pty) material when the evident iary use of such mater ia......
  • The Right to Silence, Section 2 and Recent Case Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 3-2, March 1995
    • 1 Marzo 1995
    ...LJ in Re London United Investments plc [1992] Ch. 578, 594. (54) Levi, RCCJ, Research Study No. 14 (London: HMSO 1993), p. 163. (55) [1992] 1 WLR 148. (56) Ibid, at 158. (57) Dixon, 'Common Sense, Legal Advice and the Right to Silence' [1991] PL 233. (58) Levi (1993) op cit. p. 197. (59) Se......
  • Serious Fraud Office: Conceptual Basis and Rights Considerations under Section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 4-1, March 1996
    • 1 Marzo 1996
    ...3 WLR 656, 675. (21) See Dillon LJ in Re London United Investments plc [1992] Ch 578. (22) Levi (1993) ref. 15 above, at p. 163. (23) [1992] 1 WLR 148. (24) [1988] NLJ 243. (25) [1992] 1 WLR 148, 158. (26) [1981] QB 19. (27) [1981] QB 19,35. (28) [1991] PL 233. See also McConville and Hodgs......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT