R v Shippey
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1988 |
| Year | 1988 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
112 cases
-
Maureen Peters Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...to conclude. In the circumstances the trial judge did not err in leaving the case to the jury. R v Jabber [2000] EWCA Crim 2694 applied. R v Shippey [1988] Crim LR 767 distinguished. 5. The law as to the duty of disclosure is now reasonably well settled. The law requires the crown to discl......
-
Delano Smith Appellant v R Respondent [ECSC]
...at its highest is such that a jury properly directed could properly convict. R v Galbraith [1981] 2 ALL ER 1060 applied. R v Shippey [1988] Crim. L.R. 767 distinguished. R v Pryer Sparks and Walker [2004] EWCA 1163 cited. 2. The trial judge is duty bound on the charge of murder to leave t......
- The State v Khan
-
DPP v Campion
...on an application for a direction by a trial judge are set out in cases such as R. v. Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039 and R. v. Shippey [1988] Crim. L.R. 767 are well known and do not require to be rehearsed at any length. The issue is whether this was a case, where although there was some evid......
Request a trial to view additional results