R v Stockwell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1993
Date1993
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 cases
  • R v Clarke
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
  • David Sellu v The Crown
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 15 Noviembre 2016
    ...in such a case, the judge is required to make it clear to the jury that they are not bound by the expert's opinion. In R v Stockwell [1993] 97 Cr App R 260, the court was concerned with identification. A facial mapping expert had been permitted to say "the photographs strongly support the v......
  • Attorney General's Reference (No 2 of 2002)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 7 Octubre 2002
    ...and a reasonably contemporary photograph of the defendant, provided the images and the photograph are available for the jury ( Stockwell 97 Cr App R 260, Clarke [1995] 2 Cr App R 425 and Hookway [1999] Crim LR 750). 20 In the light of those considerations, we turn to the three questions pos......
  • R v Atkins
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 2 Octubre 2009
    ...bearing on Mr Stone's submission were, however, clearly not before the court in Gray. There is no indication that the court was referred R v Stockwell (1993) 97 Cr App R 260. In Stockwell Lord Taylor CJ (with Henry and Blofeld JJ) had confronted the admissibility of evidence of facial compa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 7-4, December 2003
    • 1 Diciembre 2003
    ...Smith [1998] 2 Cr App R 1 . 117, 125R v Smith (Joe) [2001] 1 WLR 103 ....121R v Stillman [1997] 1 SCR 607 ........... 48R v Stockwell (1993) 97 Cr App R 260,CA ........................................... 175, 182R v Sullivan [2002] Crim LR 758 ..... 114R v Sutherland, The Times (30 January2......
  • JUDGING BETWEEN CONFLICTING EXPERT EVIDENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 Diciembre 2014
    ...the Law Reform Committee on Opinion Evidence (October 2011) at paras 196–197 and 199. 42 Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed. 43 R v Stockwell (1993) 97 Cr App R 260. Yet in some other cases, such evidence has been deemed to fall within “science or art”, per the previous version of s 47 of the Eviden......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 13-4, November 2009
    • 1 Noviembre 2009
    .... . . . . 142–143R v Stinchcombe [1991] 3 SCR 326, 68 CCC (3d) 1;[1995]1 SCR 754 . . . . . 225,226, 228, 229,230,249, 250R vStockwell (1993) 97Cr App R260, CA . . . . . 52R vStone (1999) 24CR (5th) 1,SCC . . . . . . . . . . 289R vStubbs (1989) 88Cr App R53. . . . . . . . . . . . 311R vSuber......
  • Expert Opinion Evidence: The Middle Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 73-5, October 2009
    • 1 Octubre 2009
    ...that statistical evidenceshould be presented by suitably qualif‌ied experts.16 Re M (Disclosure) [1998] 1 FLR 734.17 R v Stockwell [1993] 97 Cr App R 260 at 263–5.18 R v Harris; Rock; Cherry and Faulder [2006] 1 Cr App R 5 at [134].19 Rv Bates [2006] EWCA Crim 1395 at [18] and [21].20 Rv Do......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT