R v Stokesley, Yorks, Justices. ex parte Bartram

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1956
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Chan Hiang Leng Colin and Others v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 15 September 1994
    ... ... It has, of course, long been the practice for justices to decide for the purposes of a case immediately before ... very special circumstances as laid down in R v Stokesley, Yorkshire, Justices ex p Bartram ... Wan Suleiman SCJ, in ... ...
  • Re Singh Kalpanath
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 March 1992
    ...& LGR 454 (refd) R v Magistrates Court at Lilydale, ex p Ciccone [1973] VR 122 (refd) R v Stokesley Yorkshire Justices, Ex parte Bartram [1956] 1 WLR 254 (folld) R v The Commonwealth Conciliation & Arbitration Commission (1969) 122 CLR 546 (distd) R v The County Court Judge & the Justices o......
  • O'Reilly v Mackman
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 November 1982
    ...has ever had actual experience. Lord Goddard, whose experience was at that time unrivalled, had so stated in R. v. Stokesley, Yorkshire, Justices, Ex parte Bartram [1956] 1 W.L.R. 254 at 23On the other hand as compared with an action for a declaration commenced by writ or originating summo......
  • R (PG) v London Borough of Ealing, The Ealing Hospital Managers and Jonathan Scott; R (G) v Ealing LBC (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 March 2002
    ...me to a number of cases which trace the practice prior to the rule changes in 1977: R v Kent JJ ex p Smith [1928] WN 137, R v Stokesley, Yorkshire, JJ ex p Bartram [1956] 1 WLR 254, George v Secretary of State for the Environment (1979) 77 LGR 689. The position thereafter was stated author......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Procedure and Remedies in Judicial Review: A Malaysian Perspective
    • South Africa
    • Acta Juridica No. , August 2019
    • 15 August 2019
    ...2 QB 18.3[1983] 2 AC 237.4See Rules of the Supreme Court 1977. These were put on a statutory footing by theSupreme Court Act 1981.5[1956] 1 All ER 563 at 564, [1956] 1 WLR 254 at 257.353PROCEDURE AND REMEDIES IN JUDICIAL REVIEW© Juta and Company (Pty) them the private law rule of standing, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT