R v T
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 |
| Year | 2010 |
| Date | 2010 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
I R v Kuba Dlugosz
...1 Cr App R 369. 9 We cannot accept that argument. As is clear from the judgments in Atkins and Atkins (paragraph 23) and T (Footwear Mark Evidence) [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 (at paragraph 92) the fact that there is no reliable statistical basis does not mean that a court cannot admit an evaluat......
-
Ingraham v R
...The Appellant appeared pro se Ms. Darrell Taylor, Counsel for the Respondent Atkins v Atkins and T (Footwear Mark Evidence) [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 considered Curtis v The State , 205 S.W. 3d 656 (Tex. App. 2006) considered Michael Pringle v the Queen, (Privy Council Appeal 17 of 2002) consi......
-
R v Otway (Elroy Otis)
...of a database from which statistical probability could be assessed, Professor Jamieson has ignored the law of England and Wales. In T [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 at paragraphs 92–96 Thomas LJ, giving the judgment of the court, made reference to several recent cases in which, by reason of the subj......
-
R v Sergio Charles South
...scale. 29 In connection with this point, Mr Claxton referred us to statements of Thomas LJ in R v T (Footwear mark evidence) [2011] 1 Cr App R 9 at paras 73 and 74 in particular. Thomas LJ, giving the reserved judgment of the court, stated that if a footwear examiner expressed a view that w......
Get Started for Free
17 books & journal articles
-
Relative plausibility and its critics
...319, 438P.2d 33 (1968), as is the more recent case of Nulty v. Milton Keynes Borough Council, [2013] EWCA Civ 15. See also (R. v.T. [2010] EWCA Crim 2439) and R v Adams [1998] 1 Cr App R 377.Allen and Pardo 21 legal rule that the plaintiff does not automatically win even when the defendant ......
-
‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales?
...had a common source,76without any guidance as to how those similarities should be interpreted. That option was rightly rejected72. [2011] 1 Cr App R 9 at [86].73. Ibid. at [95–6].74. Above n. 72 at [73].75. The potentially misleading use of words like ‘strong’ is criticised by Gans, (2011: ......
-
Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence
...images for identification/comparison purposes: see Towler (2014). 39. Atkins and Atkins, above n. 28 at [23] quoted in R v T [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 at [93]; R v Reed, above n. 7 at [112]; above n. 7 at [5]; R v Thomas [2011] EWCA Crim 1295 at [36]; Otway, above n. 8 at [22]. 40. See above n.......
-
Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
...RvC[2010] EWCA Crim 2578 and R v Dlugosz n. 14 (allDNA cases) and see, also, R v Atkins [2010] 1 Cr App R 8 (facial mapping) and RvT[2011] 1 Cr App R 9 (footwear marks).29. Above n. 14.30. CrimPD 19A.4.Stockdale and Jackson Unfortunately, CrimPD 19A does not make clear whether it was drafte......
Get Started for Free