R v Tabassum

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year2000
Date2000
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • R v Mohammed Dica
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 5 May 2004
    ..."Yes", the concept of consent in relation to s.20 is devoid of real meaning. 38 The position here is analogous to that considered in R v Tabassum [2000] 2 CAR 328. The appellant was convicted of indecently assaulting women who allowed him to examine their breasts in the mistaken belief that......
  • R v Jheeta (Harvinder Singh)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 11 July 2007
    ...sexual intercourse and because she thought it was a surgical operation”. 26 Deception as to purpose is sometimes said to be exemplified in R v Tabassum [2000] 2CAR 328, a decision described by the late Professor Sir John Smith as a “doubtful case”. A number of women agreed to participate in......
  • R v Ozan Melin
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 2 April 2019
    ...The footnote in Smith & Hogan [publication] states that the case must be read with the decision of the Court of Appeal in Tabassum [2000] 2 Cr App R 328. At page 336 Rose LJ, Vice President, commented that in Richardson [case] the focus had been upon identity and the Prosecution had not......
  • Ian Paterson v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 6 April 2022
    ...The cases to which we were referred included R v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212, R v Richardson (Diane) [1998] 2 Cr. App. R. 200, R v Naveed Tassum [2000] 2 Cr. App. R. 328, R v Dica [2004] 2 Cr. App. R. 467, R. v B [2006] EWCA Crim 2945, R v M(B) [2018] EWCA Crim 560 and R v Lawrance [2020] EWCA ......
  • Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
  • A Different Ball Game—Why the Nature of Consent in Contact Sports Undermines a Unitary Approach
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 71-6, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...a compelling argument, as it is somewhat incongruous that theconsent of a victim can nullify the liability of a defendant who has62 [2000] 2 Cr App R 328.63 Rv Dica [2004] EWCA Crim 1103, [2004] QB 1257.64 Rv Konzani [2005] EWCA Crim 706, (2005) 69 JCL 389.65 H. Law, ‘Offences against the P......
  • Lawmakers, Law Lords and Legal Fault: Two Tales from the (Thames) River Bank: Sexual Offences Act 2003; R v G and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 68-2, March 2004
    • 1 March 2004
    ...D held no belief in such are where D intentionally deceived V as to thenature/purpose of the act (s. 76(2)(a)), cf. R v Tabassum [2000] 2 Cr App Rep 328;and where D intentionally caused V to consent to the act by impersonating aperson known personally to V (s. 76(2)(b)) (repealing the restr......
  • Proving Consent in Sexual Cases: Legislative Change and Cultural Evolution
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-1, January 2005
    • 1 January 2005
    ...2003, Part 6 cols. 26–27.146 H. Harman MP, HC Standing Committee B, 9 September 2003, Part 6 cols. 26–27.147 See R v Tabassum [2000] 2 Cr App R 328.148 Sir Walter Scott, The Heart of 22 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOFPROVING CONSENT IN SEXUAL CASESYet s. 76 appears to have omi......
  • Female Rape—An Ongoing Concern: Strategies for Improving Reporting and Conviction Levels
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 71-1, February 2007
    • 1 February 2007
    ...Act 1956 was43 [1995] Crim LR 163.44 [1999] Crim LR 62.45 [1923] 1 KB 340.46 (1887) 2 QB 410.47 [1995] QB 250, [1995] Crim LR 320.48 [2000] 2 Cr App R 328, [2000] Crim LR 686.49 [2004] EWCA Crim 1103, [2004] QB 1257.50 [1976] AC 182.The Journal of Criminal seen as outdated and ill-equipped ......
  • Get Started for Free