R v Tomlin
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1954 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
D. O'R v DPP
...91 Cr. App. R. 359. T. v. Telford J.J. ex parte Badham [1991] 2 Q.B. 78; [1991] 2 W.L.R. 866; [1991] 2 All E.R. 854. R. v. Tomlin [1954] 2 Q.B. 274; [1954] 2 W.L.R. 1140; [1954] 2 All E.R. 272; (1954) 38 Cr. App. R. 82. State (Cuddy) v. Mangan [1988] I.L.R.M. 720. State (Healy) v. Donoghue ......
- Holley v AG
-
R v Martin (Ellis)
...As to this, his initial submissions were as to law. He referred to a number of authorities including R v. Thompson (1914) 2 KB 99 and R v. Tomlin (1954) 2 QB 274 in support of the undoubted general proposition that separate offences should not be charged in the same count. The reason is set......
-
Douglas Roy Cain
...in such a way as to form one continuous taking should be the subject of a single count. R. v. Lawson (1952) 36 Cr. App. R. 30 and R. v. Tomlin (1954) 2 Q.B. 274, although dealing with a general deficiency, reflect a similar principle. 80 But the authority most closely in point is Wilson v. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...(1914) 2 K.B. 99; 83 L.J.K.B. 643; 110 I.t. 272; 78 J.P. 212; 30 T.L.R. 223; 24 Cox, 43; 9 Crim. App. R. 252. 296 R. v. Tomlin (1954) 2 Q.B. 274; 38 Crim App R 82 (1954) 2 Ad E.R. 272. . 48 R. v. Tomlinson (1895) 1 Q.B. 706; 72 L.T. 155; 43 W.R. 544; 11 T.L.R. 212; 1895-9 All E.R. 879. 65 R......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...(1952, 1All RECENTJUDICIALDECISIONS 247E.R. 804)andthis case has now been followed by the Court of CriminalAppeal in R. v. Tomlin (1954, 2 W.L.R. 1140).One of the counts on which the appellant was charged alleged thaton a day unknown between 14 March and 26 September, 1953, theappellant, be......
-
SAGOE V. THE QUEEN
...words bearing on the point in hand.) That ruling was approved by the Court of Criminal Appeal in R v. Tomlin, 38 Cr. App. R.82 at .89; (1954) 2 Q.B. 274, at p.281; it will be enough to quote this sentence: "On the view taken by the jury there was clearly a conversion or rather an em-50 bezz......