R v Tower Bridge Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Chaudhry

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1993
Date1993
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Sookoonsingh v Summary Ct
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 21 March 2006
    ...78; [1991] 2 All E.R. 858; (1991), 93 Cr. App. R. 171, considered. (12) R. v. Tower Bridge Metrop. Stip. Magistrate, ex p. Chaudhry, [1994] 1 Q.B. 340; [1994] 1 All E.R. 44; (1994), 99 Cr. App. R. 170, distinguished. (13) R. v. West London Metrop. Stip. Magistrate, ex p. Klahn, [1979] 1 W.L......
  • R v The Macclesfield Magistrates and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 February 1995
    ...such as those which faced Mr Koziarski on 2nd March 1995, are to be found in the decision of this court in R v Tower Bridge Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Chaudhry [1994] QB 340 and, in particular, in the judgment of Kennedy LJ, at page 347, where he stated as follows: 25 "Un......
  • R (Charlson) v Guildford Magistrates Court and Another; Walsh, interested party
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 September 2006
    ...Justices Manual is apparently based on the decision of the Divisional Court in R v Tower Bridge Magistrates' Court ex parte Chaudhry [1994] QB 340. That decision depends on its own special facts. The facts in ex parte Chaudhry were that the Crown Prosecution Service was actually in the proc......
  • Sibiya and Others v The Director of Public Prosecutions and Others
    • South Africa
    • Witwatersrand Local Division
    • 2 November 2004
    ...it to be unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court made reference to the approach followed in R v Home Secretary, Ex parte Bentley [1994] QB 340 (DC), ([1993] 4 All ER 442) where the Court declined to issue a mandamus or a declaration but simply invited the Home Secretary to consider the c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT