R v Tronoh Mines and The Times Publishing Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1952 |
| Date | 1952 |
| Court | Central Criminal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
DPP v Luft
...his election meant only one particular candidate and that consequently the certified question ought to be answered "Yes". These were R. v. Tronoh Mines Ltd. [1952] 1 All E.R. 697 and Grieve v. Douglas-Home 1965 S.L.T. 186. In the former case the defendant, while a general election was pend......
-
Grieve v Douglas-Home
...v. HailwoodELR, [1928] 2 K. B. 277, Avory J. at pp. 281–282; Kingston-upon-Hull Case, (1911) 6 O'M. & H. 372, Ridley J. at p. 388. 2 [1952] 1 All E. R. 697. 3 Oxford Case, (1924) 7 O'M. & H. 49, Sankey J. at p. 4 1964, cap. 21. 1 Barrow-in-Furness Case, (1886) 4 O'M. & H. 76, Field J. at pp......
-
R v Jones (Fiona)
...pages 39–40, 49; the Borough of Plymouth Case (1929) 7 O'M & H 101, particularly at pages 122–123; R v Tronoh Mines Limited and Others [1952] 1 All E.R 697; and McCrory v Hendron and Another [1993] NI 177, particularly at pages 191–196. In the last of these cases, at page 195, Kelly LJ held......
-
Meek v Lothian Regional Council
...facie involve a contravention of sec. 63 (1) of the 1949 Act. D.P.P. v. LuftELR [1977] A.C. 962 followed. R. v. Tronoh Mines Ltd.UNK [1952] 1 All E.R. 697distinguished. (3) That the balance of convenience was in favour of interiminterdict; and interim interdict granted against the distribut......
2 books & journal articles
-
Issue advocacy and third parties in the United Kingdom and Canada.
...Reform" (1998) 7 Griffith L. Rev. 185. (61) U.K., "Neill Committee Report", supra note 26 at 129. (62) See R. v. Tronoh Mines Ltd., [1952] 1 All E.R. 697, 35 Cr. App. R. 196 (Cen. Crim. Ct.) (holding that an earlier version of the third party limits considered in Bowman did not apply to gen......
-
‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising
...has long been associated with suchmarketing.6 Contested examples can be seen Walker vUnison [1995] SLT 1226, and RvTronoh Mines Ltd[1952] 1 All ER 697. The latter involved an advertised plea to voters by a company disgruntled atthe socialist policies of the incumbent government to elect ‘a ......