R v Uxbridge Justices, ex parte Heward-Mills
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1983 |
Date | 1983 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
39 cases
-
R v Reading Crown Court, ex parte Bello
...Hall has been the subject of consideration in a number of later cases all of which were reviewed by McCullough J. in R. v. Uxbridge Justice, Ex Parte Howard Mills [1983] 1 W.L.R. 56 to which I shall shortly return. I refer to only one of them R. v. Waltham Forest Justices, Ex parte Parfray ......
-
Loh Kim Chiang v Public Prosecutor
...cited a number of English cases to me. I consider it necessary only to refer to one, namely, R v Uxbridge Justices, ex p Heward-Mills [1983] 1 All ER 530 in which McCullough J considered all the relevant cases on this point starting with the judgment of Lord Denning MR in R v Southampton Ju......
- R v Wood Green Crown Court, ex parte Howe
-
R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte Guney
...the burden on a surety seeking to escape the estreatment of his recognizance, wholly or even in part, is a heavy one ( R v Uxbridge Justices, ex parte Heward-Mills [1983] 1 WLR 56). But among the matters which it has been held proper for the court to take into account in deciding whether to......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...to estreat arecognisance without taking the surety's meansinto consideration: see per McCullough U in R v Uxbridge JJ, ex pHeward-Mills [1983] 1WLR56.Theauthorities are agreed however, thatthe onus of showing that the recognisance should not be estreated is onthe surety.And,since the sum du......
-
A RE-EXAMINATION OF BAIL LAW IN SINGAPORE
...it. The bailor undertakes real risks, when an accused fails to surrender to his bail. In R v Uxbridge Justices, ex parte Heward-Mills[1983] 1 All ER 530 at 534, McCullough J quoted a statement of principle from the transcript of Donaldson LJ’s judgment in R v Knightsbridge Crown Court, ex p......