R v Uxbridge Justices, ex parte Heward-Mills

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1983
Date1983
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
39 cases
  • R v Reading Crown Court, ex parte Bello
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 Diciembre 1990
    ...Hall has been the subject of consideration in a number of later cases all of which were reviewed by McCullough J. in R. v. Uxbridge Justice, Ex Parte Howard Mills [1983] 1 W.L.R. 56 to which I shall shortly return. I refer to only one of them R. v. Waltham Forest Justices, Ex parte Parfray ......
  • Loh Kim Chiang v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 4 Mayo 1992
    ...cited a number of English cases to me. I consider it necessary only to refer to one, namely, R v Uxbridge Justices, ex p Heward-Mills [1983] 1 All ER 530 in which McCullough J considered all the relevant cases on this point starting with the judgment of Lord Denning MR in R v Southampton Ju......
  • R v Wood Green Crown Court, ex parte Howe
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 7 Marzo 1991
  • R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte Guney
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 Febrero 1995
    ...the burden on a surety seeking to escape the estreatment of his recognizance, wholly or even in part, is a heavy one ( R v Uxbridge Justices, ex parte Heward-Mills [1983] 1 WLR 56). But among the matters which it has been held proper for the court to take into account in deciding whether to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Divisional Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 56-1, February 1992
    • 1 Febrero 1992
    ...to estreat arecognisance without taking the surety's meansinto consideration: see per McCullough U in R v Uxbridge JJ, ex pHeward-Mills [1983] 1WLR56.Theauthorities are agreed however, thatthe onus of showing that the recognisance should not be estreated is onthe surety.And,since the sum du......
  • A RE-EXAMINATION OF BAIL LAW IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 Diciembre 2005
    ...it. The bailor undertakes real risks, when an accused fails to surrender to his bail. In R v Uxbridge Justices, ex parte Heward-Mills[1983] 1 All ER 530 at 534, McCullough J quoted a statement of principle from the transcript of Donaldson LJ’s judgment in R v Knightsbridge Crown Court, ex p......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT