R v Vye ; R v Wise ; R v Stephenson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Judgment Date18 February 1993
Date18 February 1993

Court of Appeal

Before Lord Taylor of Gosforth, Lord Chief Justice, Mr Justice Judge and Mr Justice Hidden

Regina
and
Vye Regina v Wise Regina v Stephenson

Criminal procedure - defendant's good character - judge's direction- guidance

Effect of accused's good character

Guidance on the direction judges should give of the effect of a defendant's good character was provided by the Court of Appeal when delivering reserved judgment on appeals in three cases listed together all based on criticisms of the judges' directions to the jury on the effect of good character.

The situation concerning such directions regarding the relevance of good character to the defendant's credibility (the first limb) and his propensity to behave as alleged by the Crown (the second limb) had been described as something of a lottery.

The appeals were brought by John Arthur Wye, aged 50, of Anchor Road, Bournemouth; Peter Frederick James Wise, aged 36, of Lower Road, Hextable, Kent and Malcolm Stephenson, aged 37, of Hindhead Gardens, Northolt.

Mr Christopher Clark, QC and Mr Paul Garlick for Vye; Mr Christopher Clark, QC and Mr Peter Digney for Wise; Mr Michael Wolkind for Stephenson; all assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals; Mr Martin Wilson, QC and Mr John Coveny, Mr James Bullen and Mr Nicholas Brown for the Crown.

THE LORD CHIEF...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
270 cases
  • Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 21 March 2012
    ...so insurmountable that, even with a good character direction given to the jury, his conviction was inevitable. R v Vye and Others (1993) 97 Cr. App. R. 134 applied; Eversley Thompson v The Queen [1998] A.C. 811 applied; Teeluck and John v The State of Trinidad and Tobago [2005] UKPC 14; [2......
  • Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 21 March 2012
    ...so insurmountable that, even with a good character direction given to the jury, his conviction was inevitable. R v Vye and Others (1993) 97 Cr. App. R. 134 applied; Eversley Thompson v The Queen [1998] A.C. 811 applied; Teeluck and John v The State of Trinidad and Tobago [2005] UKPC 14; [2......
  • Teeluck and another v State of Trinidad and Tobago
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 23 March 2005
  • Mattison v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 22 October 2010
    ...91 Cr. App. R. 131, referred to. (6) R. v. CameronUNK(1989), 26 J.L.R. 453, dicta of Wright J.A. applied. (7) R. v. Vye, [1993] 1 W.L.R. 471; [1993] 3 All E.R. 241, dicta of Lord Taylor, C.J. applied. (8) Singh v. State, [2006] 1 W.L.R. 146; [2005] 4 All E.R. 781; [2006] 2 LRC 409; (2005), ......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • The Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence in English Criminal Proceedings
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 76-3, June 2012
    • 1 June 2012
    ...itmight amount to evidence of bad character67).61 R vRobinson [1994] 3 All ER 346.62 Ibid.63 R vRowton (1865) Le & Ca 520.64 R vVye [1993] 1 WLR 471.65 R v Redgrave (1981) 74 Cr App R 10.66 (1987) 43 DLR (4th) 641.67 If such evidence did amount to evidence of the accused’s bad character, an......
  • Privy Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 67-6, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...befollowed and applied in Trinidad and Tobago, was similarly bypassed.Of greater substance was the second ground of appeal. In R vVye[1993] 1 WLR 471, the Court of Appeal gave f‌irm guidance on therelevant principles to be applied in ‘good character’ cases. Essentially, asthe House of Lords......
  • Revised Guidance on Good Character Directions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 79-5, October 2015
    • 1 October 2015
    ...which future courts should need to con-sider in relation to this issue are Hunter itself, the decision of the Court of Appeal in RvVye [1993] 1WLR 471 and that of the House of Lords in RvAziz [1995] 3 All ER 149. The guidance provided by theCourt of Appeal in Hunter (at [77]–[103]) is as fo......
  • Foreign criminal convictions and character directions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 79-6, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...relevant both tothe defendant’s credibility and to the likelihood of them having committed the offence with which theyare charged (RvVye [1993] 1 WLR 471; RvAziz [1995] 3 All ER 149). Thus in Vye the Court of Appealidentified;...it must be for the trial judge in each case to decide how he t......