R v Warwickshire County Council, ex parte Collymore

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1995
Year1995
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
36 cases
  • Gorstew Ltd and Another v Contractor-General
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 30 January 2013
    ...does the public interest require that the application should be permitted to proceed?’); R v Warwickshire Country Council, ex p Collymore [1995] ELR 217, 228F-G (‘it is … for the [claimant] to establish that there is good reason for time to be extended’); R (Rayner) v Secretary of State for......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2015-09-22, [2015] UKUT 539 (IAC) (R (on the application of MS) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (excluded persons: Restrictive Leave policy) (IJR))
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 22 September 2015
    ...is sufficient flexibility. A further case cited to us in respect of this issue was R v Warwickshire County Council ex parte Collymore [1995] ELR 217. This was a case concerning the award of discretionary grants to students in particular those training for the legal profession. The evidence ......
  • CH 5216 2001
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 8 October 2003
    ...education grants or awards at issue in R v. Hampshire CC ex parte W [1994] ELR 460 and R v. Warwickshire CC ex parte Collymore [1995] ELR 217: per Jackson J in R v. Thanet DC ex parte Warren Court Hotels (2001) 33 HLR 339 at 348, paragraph 46, distinguishing Collymore and “In the nature of ......
  • R (on the application of MS) v Home Secretary
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 4 September 2015
    ...is sufficient flexibility. 111 A further case cited to us in respect of this issue was R v Warwickshire County Council ex parte Collymore [1995] ELR 217. This was a case concerning the award of discretionary grants to students in particular those training for the legal profession. The evide......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT