R v Weil
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1882 |
| Date | 1882 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Son Kaewsa and Others v Superintendent of Changi Prison and Another
... ... The decisions cited by state counsel were R v Wei l [1882] 9 QBD 701 which was followed by a Singapore court in Re Said Mohamed (No 1) [1911] De Mello 587 In R v Weil [1882] 9 QBD 701 the Court of Appeal decided that hearsay evidence was admissible as the section merely required the magistrate to be satisfied, in his opinion , and that it was a judicial discretion. Jessel MR said: `There must be some evidence, but very little will do, for it is merely for ... ...
- R v Pentonville Prison (Governor)ex parte Ecke
-
R v Governor of Pentonville Prison ex parte Sotiriadis
...as regards fixing the date of apprehension in a case such as the present where the person charged is already under detention, see R v. Weil [1882] 9 Q.B.D. 701, Athanassiadis v. Government of Greece [1971] A.C. 282. The supposed existence of a difficulty of this kind obviously influenced th......
-
R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Osman (No. 3)
...issue of a warrant for the arrest of a person accused of committing a corresponding offence in the United Kingdom. In Reg. v. WeilELR (1882) 9 Q.B.D. 701, a case under the Extradition Act 1870, Sir George Jessel M.R. said, at pp. 705–706: ‘Another point suggested was this—that the evidence ......
Request a trial to view additional results