R v Weir (Michael Clive)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date06 February 2001
Date06 February 2001

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Cannonier v DPP; Isaac and Others v DPP
    • Caribbean Community
    • Court of Appeal (Eastern Caribbean States)
    • Invalid date
  • Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 21 March 2012
    ...34. 13Monnell and Morris v United Kingdom (1988) 10 E.H.H.R. 205. 14Golder v United Kingdom (A/18) (1979-80) 1 E.H.R.R. 524; R v Weir [2001] 1 W.L.R. 421 at para. 16. 15Ford v Labrador [2003] W.L.R. 2082 at paras. 17-19. 16Perez de Rada Cavanilles v Spain (2000) 29 E.H.R.R. 109, para. 44. 1......
  • Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 21 March 2012
    ...34. 13Monnell and Morris v United Kingdom (1988) 10 E.H.H.R. 205. 14Golder v United Kingdom (A/18) (1979-80) 1 E.H.R.R. 524; R v Weir [2001] 1 W.L.R. 421 at para. 16. 15Ford v Labrador [2003] W.L.R. 2082 at paras. 17-19. 16Perez de Rada Cavanilles v Spain (2000) 29 E.H.R.R. 109, para. 44. 1......
  • Cannonier v The Director of Public Prosecutions; Isaac et Al v The Director of Public Prosecutions
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 21 March 2012
    ...of access to a court is inherent in these fair trial provisions ( Golder v. United Kingdom (A/18) (1979-80) 1 E.H.R.R. 524; R v. Weir [2001] 1 W.L.R. 421 at para. 16.). The State is entitled to have procedural rules in place in order to regulate the right of access to a court. However, thes......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Non-Conviction DNA Databases in the United States and England: Historical Differences, Current Convergences?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 15-4, October 2011
    • 1 October 2011
    ...the conviction, finding that the trial judge had no discretion toallow either the first sample or further evidence. 27 R v Weir [2001] 2 All ER 216.28 PACE, s. 64(1A).29 A recordable offence is one which carries the possibility of a custodial sentence as well as other, non-imprisonable offe......
  • Lost and Destroyed Evidence: The Search for a Principled Approach to Abuse of Process
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-3, July 2005
    • 1 July 2005
    ...Principle in Evidence and Procedure’ in P. Mirfield andR. Smith (eds), Essays for Colin Tapper (LexisNexis: London, 2003) 107 at 120.106 [2001] 1 WLR 421 at THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 177LOST AND DESTROYED EVIDENCE: A PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO ABUSE OF PROCESScould be taken ......