R v Willesden Justices, ex parte Clemmings

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1987
Year1987
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Lennox Linton Claimant v Maureen Hyman "Chief Magistrate Ag., District "A", St John's Attorney General (Antigua and Barbuda) Defendants [ECSC]
    • Caribbean Community
    • Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
    • 17 August 2006
    ...on the part of the prosecution and prejudice to him argued Ms. Nelson 50 Ms. Nelson also placed reliance on the case of R v Willesden Justices, Ex Parte Clemmings (1988) 87 CA R280. The facts in brief are that the applicant had been charged with obtaining a cheque by deception. Following th......
  • Sookoonsingh v Summary Ct
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 21 March 2006
    ...p. Klahn, [1979] 1 W.L.R. 933; [1979] 2 All E.R. 221; [1979] Crim. L.R. 393, followed. (14) R. v. Willesden JJ., ex p. ClemmingsUNK(1987), 87 Cr. App. R. 280, referred to. (15) R. v. Wilson, ex p. Battersea Borough Council, [1947] 2 All E.R. 569, considered. (16) Rice v. Connolly, [1966] 2 ......
  • R v Liverpool City Justices and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 23 July 1998
    ...given a formal form of words by the Associate. "This matter be referred to the Legal Aid Board under Regulation 109R v Willesden Justices ex p Clemmings [1988] 87 Cr App R 280 Bingham LJ said at page 286, after referring to the decision made by those justices: "I must, however, remind mysel......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT