R v Williams (Roy)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R v Jannaway (Terrance Stuart)
... ... We also raised points on remarks in Williams [2001] 1 CAR (S) 500 and on the purpose(s) of the discretions under s.71(1) and s.72(3) of the 1988 Act ... 10 It was ... ...
-
R v John Reginald David Morgan and Another
...for making both confiscation and compensation orders. She did, though not immediately, identify the authority she had in mind as R v Roy Williams [2001] 1 Cr App R (S) 140 at 500. She had not got the case for the Judge, nor was she able to tell him anything about what it said. It is not dir......
-
DPP v Cumberton
...has adopted a more liberal approach to the admission of expert evidence as reflected in R v Luttrell [2004] 2 Cr App R 31; R v Reed [2001] 1 Cr App R 23 and R v Atkins [2010] 1 Cr App R 8 amongst other cases. Their position is that although expert evidence of a scientific nature is not a......
-
Bovell-Swanson v R
...R. v. MunneryUNK(1990), 94 Cr. App. R. 164, applied. (13) R. v. Ngan, [1998] 1 Cr. App. R. 331, referred to. (14) R. v. Williams, [2001] 1 Cr. App. R. 23; [2001] Crim. L.R. 253, referred to. (15) Tuck v. Vehicle Inspectorate, [2004] EWHC 728 (Admin), referred to. (16) Walker v. R., 2006 CIL......
1 books & journal articles
-
Court of Appeal
...to see how the defendant therebyobtained property belonging to [the lender]. (at [834])However, Preddy was distinguished by RvWilliams [2001] 1 Cr App R 23 where it was held that abuilder, who obtained sums of money through unnecessary or overvalued building work, had appro-priated property......