R v Winsor

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtUnspecified Court
Date1866
Year1866

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Eastman v R
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 25 May 2000
    ...on the Laws of England (1803), vol V (bk IV) at 24–25; see also Holdsworth, A History of English Law, vol VIII at 439. 464 R v Schleter (1866) 10 Cox CC 409 465 Proceedings in the Case of John Frith for High Treason (1790) 22 Howell's State Trials 307 at 318. 466 Mental Health (Criminal Pro......
  • R v Carroll
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 5 December 2002
    ...14 App Cas 665 at 668. 157 Friedland, Double Jeopardy (1969) at 4. 158Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 1254. 159 (1866) 10 Cox CC 327 at 160 (1946) 73 CLR 583 at 599. 161 [1964] AC 1254. 162 [1964] AC 1254 at 1354. 163 [1964] AC 1254 at 1296, 1347, 1365–1368. 164 (1977) ......
  • R v Robinson (Adeline)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 11 November 1974
    ...exists. 13 To support that proposition, although no authority precisely in point can be cited, Mr. Williams does cite and relies upon R. v. Charlotte winsor 10 Cox's Criminal Law Cases 276 and R. v. Charlesworth reported in Volume 1 of Best and Smith's ports at page 460. In the case of R. v......
  • Regina v Ambimp [1971–72] PNGLR 258
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 July 1971
    ...168 ER 352 at 353, R v Pike (1829) 3 Car & P 598; 172 ER 562 at 563, R v Perkins (1840), 9 Car & P 395; 173 ER 884 at 885, R v Forrester (1866) 10 Cox CC 368, R v Osman (1881) 15 Cox CC 1 at 3, R v Perry [1909] 2 KB 697 at 701 and R v Donohoe (1962) 79 WN (NSW) 693 at 698 referred to.S32 of......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Straf- en delikregtelike aanspreeklikheid vir sportbeserings
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...Beheer van Boks en Stoei 39 van 1954 soos gewysig. 139 Sien Kuhlmann 1975 Wisconsin LR 782-783. 140 R v Coney 1982 8 QBD 534; R v Young 1866 10 Cox CC 371 (CA); Crayson Sport and the Law 140-141 141 Cf Eser 1978 JZ 368; Kaiser Liability and Law in Recreation, Parks and Sports (1986) 193-200......