R v Woodrow (William Alfred)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1959
Date1959
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • R v Jones (John)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 22 March 1974
  • Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R v Warner
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 2 May 1968
    ...offences and it does not really offend the ordinary man's sense of justice that moral guilt is not of the essence of the offence. 5 Reg. v. Woodrow (1846) 15 M. & W. 400 was an early case. A statute provided that "every … retailer of tobacco who shall receive or take into or have in his pos......
  • R v Taylor (Vincent)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ...Les Termes de la Ley (1641 ed.), p. 14. Reg. v. Allan [1965] 1 Q.B. 130; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 677; [1963] 2 All E.R. 897, C.C.A. Reg. v. Woodrow (1959) 43 Cr.App.R. 105, C.C.A. Rex v. Smith [1914] 2 Ir.R. 190. Russell on Crime, 1st ed. (1819), vol. 1, p. 388. State v. Jordon (1965) 207 A. 2d 563......
  • R v George David Clark
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 23 September 1976
    ...of affray was held by this Court not to have included more than one activity of affray is the earlier case of Woodrow Volume 43 Criminal Appeal Reports 105. That was a case in which an affray was charged as having been made by a number of people, including Woodrow, Cooper and Harrington "on......