R v X and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Ramcharran v Commissioner of Correctional Services and DPP and another
...However, the learned trial judge has a duty to warn the jury of the danger of acting on the uncorroborated evidence of an accomplice. (See R v Turner [1975] 61 Cr. App. R 67 ). The editor of Phipson on Evidence, 14 th edition [1990] paragraph 14 – 10 states: "An accomplice who is separatel......
-
R (Al-Fawwaz) v Governor of Brixton Prison
...by an accused to the decision of a magistrate or judge to admit the evidence of an anonymous witness is given in the judgments delivered in R v D J X (1989) 91 Cr App R 36 and R v Watford Magistrates Court, Ex p Lenman [1993] Crim LR 388. In the former case Lord Lane CJ stated at p 40: "The......
-
R v Davis (Iain); R v Ellis; R v Gregory; R v Simms; R v Martin
...that the identity of witnesses should be withheld". The only authority cited in support of that proposition was R v DJX, SCY and GCZ (1989) 91 Cr App R 36 (" R v X, Y and Z"). That was a case in which screens had been erected so that child victims and the defendants accused of abusing them ......
-
R (D) v Camberwell Green Youth Court; R (G) v Camberwell Green Youth Court
...that the divergence of approach between Lord Steyn and Lord Hope in A [2002] 1 AC 45 was unanimously resolved by the House of Lords in In Re S [2002] 2 AC 291 at 313, paragraphs 38 to 40, per Lord Nicholls. Lord Nicholls distinguished between interpretation of statutes being for the courts ......
Request a trial to view additional results