R (Watson) v Dartford Magistrates' Court

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2005] EWHC 905 (Admin)
Year2005
Date2005
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • R (Surat Singh) v Stratford Magistrates Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 3 July 2007
    ...sometimes been persuaded to consider a case which is interlocutory where there is good reason for doing so: see for example R (Watson) v Dartford Magistrates Court [2005] EWHC 905 (Admin) and the discussion in Essen v DPP [2005] EWHC 1077 (Admin). That we have been persuaded to do likewise ......
  • (1) The Queen (on the application of the Director of Public Prosecutions) v Sunderland Magistrates' Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 14 February 2018
    ...the original decision; in that regard I take some support from the decision of Mitting J inR (Watson) v Dartford Magistrates' Court [2005] EWHC 905 (Admin)who observed that there was no fetter on this court intervening. 32. Having said that, it is important that the position is fully unders......
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Manchester and Salford Magistrates' Court John Blakeley (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 July 2017
    ...what he describes as this general principle but challenges the proposition that it is a question of jurisdiction. Thus, in R (Watson) v Dartford Magistrates' Court [2005] EWHC 905 (Admin), following a refusal by one bench to adjourn a trial, a further application without a change of circums......
  • Balogun v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 12 March 2010
    ...and thereafter setting aside the original decision: in that regard, I take some support from observations of Mitting J in R(Watson) v Dartford Magistrates Court [2005] EWHC 905 (Admin) who observed that there was no fetter on this court intervening. 32 Having said that, it is important that......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT