R (Woods) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2009] EWHC 2503 (Admin)
Year2009
Date2009
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • MT v The Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 July 2013
    ...R (West) v Parole Board [2005] UKHL 1,R (Gulliver) v Parole Board [2007] EWCA Civ 1386,R (Woods) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWHC 2503 (Admin), R (McDonagh) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 369,R (Howden v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2521 (Admin), and ......
  • R Calder v Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 31 October 2014
    ...decided to release. While acknowledging that the remarks in Gulliver were obiter and that as a matter of precedent I would not be bound by Woods or McHale, they are highly persuasive and I would not have departed from them. Moreover, in my judgment, there is no relevant or material distinct......
  • McHale v Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 October 2010
    ... ... appears to have dealt with this issue centrally; that is a decision of HHJ Frances Kirkham sitting as a High Court Judge in the case of R (Woods) v The Secretary of State for Justice and The Parole Board [2009] EWHC 2503 (Admin) ... In that case it was accepted by the Secretary of State that ... ...
  • R (Maxfield) v Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 March 2010
    ... ... the claimant's recall to prison should be reviewed once again, possibly at an oral hearing or alternatively (b) if and when the decision in R (Woods) v SSJ [2009] EWHC 2503, to which I refer later in this judgment, is overturned by the Court of Appeal that he should then be released immediately on ... On the date of release, Mr Maxwell attended the probation office as instructed and gave a second address—of 4 Penstock Drive, Oldbury, in another area of the West Midlands—stating that having been to the original address, he had been told by his partner that he could no longer stay there. It ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT