Radcliffe v Bartholomew

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1892
Date1892
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • DPP (Clarke) v Stafford
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 14 June 2005
    ... ... obtained within six months - Dodds v Walker [1981] 1 WLR 027; Williams v Burgess (1840) 12 Ad &El 635; Young v Higgon (1840) 6 M & W 49; Radcliffe v Bartholomew (1892) 1 Q B 161 and Frew v Morris (1897) 34 ScLR 527 followed - Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act 1851 (14 & 15 Vict, c 93), s 10(4) - ... ...
  • CRIMINAL ASSETS BUREAU (CAB) v McS (P)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 16 November 2001
    ...20.12.2000 2000/5/1609 TAXES CONSOLIDATION ACT 1997 S933(7) MCGUINNESS V ARMSTRONG PATENTS LTD 1980 IR 289 RADCLIFFE V BARTHOLOMEW 1892 1 QB 161 INTERPRETATION ACT 1937 S11(H) PESCA VALENTIA V MIN FOR FINANCE 1985 IR 193 INTERPRETATION ACT 1937 S18 TAXES CONSOLIDATION ACT 1997 S957(2) TAX......
  • McGuinness v Armstrong Patents
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 July 1980
  • Chief Constable of Merseyside Police v Lawrence Robert Reynolds
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 19 November 2004
    ...Havers J, in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 3 All ER 270, [1961] 2 QB 135. Havers J applied the principles established by Radcliffe and Bartholomew [1892] 1 QB 161, that is to say that the day a cause of action arises or an offence is committed is to be excluded in computing a lim......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT