Radius Housing Association Limited (Formerly Helm Housing Limited) (Formerly BIH Housing Association) v JNP Architects, Michael Jennings and Brian Murphy of BDO NI, Albert Fry Associates Limited, David Rea T/A A G Crawford and Co
| Jurisdiction | Northern Ireland |
| Judge | Horner J |
| Judgment Date | 04 July 2018 |
| Neutral Citation | [2018] NIQB 57 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland) |
| Date | 04 July 2018 |
1
Neutral Citation No: [2018] NIQB 57
Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down
(subject to editorial corrections)*
Ref:HOR10510
Delivered: 4/7/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND
_________
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
_________
2015 No. 22837
BETWEEN:
RADIUS HOUSING ASSOCIATIONLIMITED (FORMERLY HELM HOUSING
ASSOCIATION LIMITED) (FORMERLY BIH HOUSING ASSOCIATION
LIMITED)
Plaintiff;
-and-
(1) JNP ARCHITECTS
(2)MICHAEL JENNINGS AND BRIAN MURPHY OF BDO NORTHERN
IRELAND AS JOINT ADMINISTRATORS OVER T & A KERNOGHAN
(GROUP) LIMITED
(3)ALBERT FRY ASSOCIATES LIMITED
(4)DAVID REA T/A A G CRAWFORD AND CO
Defendants.
__________
HORNER J
A.INTRODUCTION
[1]Radius Housing Association Limited (“Radius”) is the plaintiff.It was
formerly known as Helm Housing Association Limited andbefore thatBIH Housing
Association Limited. Radius has asked this court to try the issue of liability only
arising out of the construction of two apartment blocks at Newtownards. Both these
apartment blocks suffer from serious damp penetration.
2
[2]Originally proceedings were issued against JNP Architects(“the Architects”),
T & A Kernoghan (Group) Limited (“the Builder”), Albert Fry Associates Limited
(“the Engineers”) and David Rea t/aA G Crawford and Co (“the QS”).
However the claims against both the QS and the Engineers were not pursued. The
Builder is in administration. Its solicitors have come off record. I understand that it
has no assets. Thishasleft Radius to pursue its claims against the Architectsalone in
respect of the water ingress and its effects on the two blocks of apartments. The
Architectsin their defencehave relied, inter alia, upon a Net Contribution Clause
(“NCC”) contained in their contract with Radius. Sucha clause, if effective, converts
what would normally be a joint and several liabilityinto a several liability only.
Thus instead of the Architectsbeing liable100% if theywerejointlyto blame with
the Builder, under the NCC they become responsible only for their share of the
blame. In a contract with an NCC the employer “cannot recover more than the
percentage contribution which would be found against the Architect if the
Contractor and other consultants contributed inproportionto their fault:” see 2-033
of Hudson’s Building and Engineering Contracts (13thEdition).Both the Architects
and Radius agreethat there is a NCC clause which is binding upon themin this
dispute. Where they differ is as to its effect.
[3]Therefore in these proceedingsthe court has been concerned with
determiningtwo issues. Firstly, whether the Architectswere guilty of a breach of
contract and/or negligence. Secondly, if so what was the Architects’ share of
responsibility, if any,for anyof thedefectsand their effects on the two blocks of
apartments?
[4]I did agree that this trial would be confined to the issue of liability alone and
that I would hear the issue of quantum later. My provisional view was that should I
find that thereshouldbe a sharing of responsibility between the Architectsand the
Builderin respect of the defects which affected two apartment blocks, it wouldbe
necessary for me to hear the quantum evidence before I made any apportionmenton
the basis of what was “just and equitable”in respect of the entire claim. Having
reviewed the evidence in detail, I am satisfied that this provisional view is the
correct one. To take one example, it is accepted that there has been a problem with
the balconies of some of the apartments. However I am in no position to reach any
conclusion as to how this problem contributed to the additional costs that are or will
be incurred. Therefore I cannot make afinalapportionment on the basis of what is
just and equitablein respect of all the claims which are proven.
[5]Finally, I should congratulate both sides and their legal representatives on the
quality and extent of their submissionswhich have been made both orally and in
writing. They ranged far and wide. I have tried to set out as concisely as possible
the arguments made to me and the points which have been taken by each side. But
for the sake of brevity I have not obviously included everything. I have dealt with
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting