Ragho Prasad v The Queen
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1981 |
Year | 1981 |
Date | 1981 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
R v Mushtaq (Ashfaq Ahmed)
...the 1984 Act, and it seems clear that the law, in this respect, remains unaltered. 3 Chan Wei Keung [1967] 2 AC 160; Ragho Prasad [1981] 1 WLR 469; Burgess [1968] 2 QB 112; Ovenell [1969] 1 QB 17; McCarthy (1980) 70 Cr. App. R 270. See also Ajodha v State [1982] AC 204, at 221 (per Lo......
-
Mcintosh v R
...v. Reg. [1967] 1 All E.R.948, R. v. Ovenell [1968] 1 A11 E.R.933, and the recent Privy Council case of Prasad v. The Queen [1981] 1 All E.R.319. See the Guyanese case of The State v. Gobin & Griffith.] 102 That the trial judge is under the obligation to rule on the question of voluntariness......
- Macpherson v R
- François v The State
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Stare decisis and the development of Caribbean jurisprudence
...(1961) 7 W.I.R. 486, the Privy Council seemed more intent on applying local laws than did the local judges. In Prasadv.The Queen [1981] 1 All E.R. 319 the Privy Council, per curiam, noted that "courts of appeal composed of judges more familiar with local conditions and social attitudes than......