Ragho Prasad v The Queen

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1981
Year1981
Date1981
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • R v Mushtaq (Ashfaq Ahmed)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 April 2005
    ...the 1984 Act, and it seems clear that the law, in this respect, remains unaltered. 3 Chan Wei Keung [1967] 2 AC 160; Ragho Prasad [1981] 1 WLR 469; Burgess [1968] 2 QB 112; Ovenell [1969] 1 QB 17; McCarthy (1980) 70 Cr. App. R 270. See also Ajodha v State [1982] AC 204, at 221 (per Lo......
  • Mcintosh v R
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • 29 November 1985
    ...v. Reg. [1967] 1 All E.R.948, R. v. Ovenell [1968] 1 A11 E.R.933, and the recent Privy Council case of Prasad v. The Queen [1981] 1 All E.R.319. See the Guyanese case of The State v. Gobin & Griffith.] 102 That the trial judge is under the obligation to rule on the question of voluntariness......
  • Macpherson v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • François v The State
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Stare decisis and the development of Caribbean jurisprudence
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 8-2, December 1998
    • 1 December 1998
    ...(1961) 7 W.I.R. 486, the Privy Council seemed more intent on applying local laws than did the local judges. In Prasadv.The Queen [1981] 1 All E.R. 319 the Privy Council, per curiam, noted that "courts of appeal composed of judges more familiar with local conditions and social attitudes than......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT