Ralph Slyfeld & Mary son feme port Action de dett v Edward Sybil & declare
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Year | 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 328
DEL COMMON-BANK
XXIX. Ralph Slyfeld & Mary son feme port Action de dett vers Edward Sybil & declare que lea dita Plaintiffs per lour fait indent fait enter eux & Thomas Slyfeld de Tun part, & le dit Edward Sybil d'auter part, demise a le dit Edward 4. messuages 500. acres de terres, &c. in Kingsdon, &c. auxint le moyte del mannor de Chepstede, &c. pur ans rendant rent, &c. & que le rent fuit arere, pur quel ils porter lour Action, a que le Defendant plede que le dit Plaintiff ne demise les dits messuages, terres, &c. & moyte del mannor in mariner & forme, & sur ceo fuerunt a issue, le Jure trove que lea Plaintiffs demise les messuages & terres en manner & forme come est allege p le Plaintiff, & assesse dam mages & costs, & trove ouster que les Plaintiffs ne demise le moyte del dit mannor in manner & forme, &c. Et sur cest Verdit le Court done judgment que le dit breve abate; car nest tiel lease come en le Declaration est mencyon, eins de part des Tenements la mencyon & nemy de touts; Et en cest Case [14J si le Jure ussent done lour Verdit a touts les Tenements mesque al moyte del mannor, B pur le dit moyte ussent dit Hen, le Verdit ne ust my bien prise, mes ouster-ment voyd; car neat bien examine ne done en cest Case ne en nul auter quant le Jure done Verdit que ne serve le Plaintiff ne defendant, issint le Court ne conuscer pur qua ils doner jugement. Nota bene les matters sur aurdants sur ceo H. 9. Eliz. Rot. 457.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Darel Christopher v Benedicta Samuels dba Samuels Richardson & Company
...General (BVIHCV2006/0306) 9. Gailius Mathurin et al v Andrew Paul Claim No. SLUHCV2002/0867—Judgment delivered on 28 January 2004 (oral) and 13 July 2004 (written)-unreported 10. Haithwaite v Thomson Snell & Passmore (a firm) [2009] EWHC 647 at paras. 22 to 27. 11. Hanif v Middleweeks (a fi......
-
Festa v R
...evidence of later acts of identification by which the four witnesses said they recognised the appellant as the female they had seen on 27 May and 13 June respectively, although some of that evidence also fell short of positive identification. 8 Three witnesses, Mr Fyffe, Ms Ogilvie, and Mr ......
-
Brantley Inc. v Antarctica Asset Management Ltd
...LJ held that the only significant difference between the provisions of CPR 24.2 (which deals with summary judgments in England and Wales) and 13.3 (1) (which deals with default judgments), is that under the former the overall burden of proof rests upon the claimant to establish that there a......
-
Svg Green Party Ivan O'neal Claimants v Attorney General The Supervisor of Elections Respondents [ECSC]
...is discriminatory it falls within the exception of being reasonably justifiable in a democratic society as provided in Section 13 (4) (d), and 13 (4) (a) in that it is a law which makes provision for the appropriation of public revenue or other public funds. (3) That there was undue delay i......