Ramsbotham v Senior

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1865
Date1865
CourtEquity
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Re HM (A Vulnerable Adult: Abduction)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 24 June 2010
    ...also to mention. First, that legal professional privilege is no answer to such an order: Burton v Earl of Darnley (1869) LR 8 Eq 576n, Ramsbotham v Senior (1869) LR 8 Eq 575. Second, that the court's powers in this kind of case – where it is seeking to locate a missing child – are not subje......
  • Re L (Minors) (Police investigation: Privilege)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 March 1996
    ...This is an application, in the wardship context, of the principle that a solicitor has no greater privilege than the client: see Ramsbotham v. Senior (1869) 8 Eq. 575, 578, per Malins V-C. 73 The authorities do establish that all procedural rules are subject to one general exception, or lim......
  • Re D (Minors) (Conciliation: Disclosure of Information)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...H (Conciliation: Welfare Reports), Re [1986] 1 FLR 476. M (Social Work Records: Disclosure), Re [1990] FCR 485. Ramsbotham v Senior (1869) LR 8 Eq 575. R v Birmingham City Council, ex parte O [1982] 1 WLR 679; [1982] 2 All ER R v Lewes Justices, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Depa......
  • Re B (Minors) (Wardship: Power to detain)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 May 1994
    ...J, Re [1988] 1 FLR 65. R (Ward: Witness), Re [1991] FCR 642; [1991] Fam 56; [1991] 2 WLR 912; [1991] 2 All ER 193. Ramsbotham v Senior (1869) LR 8 Eq 575. W (A Minor) (Medical Treatment: Court's Jurisdiction), Re[1992] 2 FCR 785; [1993] Fam 64; [1992] 3 WLR 758; [1992] 4 All ER X (A Minor),......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Reverse engineering legal professional privilege in a globalising world – the Australian case
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Money Laundering Control No. 23-3, October 2020
    • 10 April 2020
    ...v Howard Smith & Co Ltd (1910) 10 CLR 382, 385, 386, 390.17. R v Bell; Ex parte LEES (1980) 146 CLR 141, [5].18. Ramsbotham v Senior (1869) LR 8 Eq 575, 578–9.19. FATF, Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Vulnerabilities of Legal Professionals (June2013) 7.20. FATF, Typology Report (20......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT