Ramsey v Leonard Curtis (A Firm)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Insight Group Ltd and another v Kingston Smith (A Firm)[Queen's Bench Divison]
...as to the rights of the original party.49 The second case in which substitution was held to be impermissible was Ramsey v Leonard Curtis [2001] BPIR 389. There a claim was made against the accountancy firm in which the two administrative receivers of a company were partners. The only tenabl......
-
The Insight Group Ltd and Another v Kingston Smith (A Firm)
...error was one as to the rights of the original party. 49 The second case in which substitution was held to be impermissible was Ramsey v Leonard Curtis (a firm) [2001] BPIR 389. There a claim was made against the accountancy firm in which the two administrative receivers of a company were p......
-
Dalmare SpA v Union Maritime Ltd [QBD]
...Aventis Pasteur MSD LtdWLR [2008] 1 WLR 1188. Parkinson Engineering Services plc v Swan [2010] PNLR 17. Ramsey v Leonard Curtis (a firm) [2001] BPIR 389. Rodriguez v ParkerELR [1967] 1 QB 116. Sardinia Sulcis, The[1991] 1 Ll Rep 201. Welsh v Parnianzadeh (t/a Southern Fried Chicken)UNK [200......
-
Kesslar v Moore & Tibbits
...to allow Rule 19.5(3)(a) to be invoked. For that view, the District Judge relied on the case of Ramsey and Maclaine v Leonard Curtis [2001] BPIR 389. That was a claim against two administrative receivers who happened to be partners in the defendant firm of Leonard Curtis. However, they did ......