Randall v R

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date2002
Date2002
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • Siemer v The Solicitor-General
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 12 Julio 2013
    ... ... 28 R v Forbes [2001] 1 AC 473 (HL) at [24] and Brown v Scott [2003] 1 AC 681 (PC) at 693. See also R v Hansen [2007] NZSC 7 , [2007] 3 NZLR 1 at [38]; R v Stewart (Eric) [2009] NZSC 53 , [2009] 3 NZLR 425 at [33]; Randall v R [2002] UKPC 19 , [2002] 1 WLR 2237 at [28]; and R v Horsham Justices ex parte Farquharson [1982] 1 QB 762 (CA) ... 29 See discussion in Condon v R [2006] NZSC 62 , [2007] 1 NZLR 300 at [77]; and in R v Hansen , above n 28, at [36]–[38] ... 30 ... ...
  • R v H and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 Febrero 2004
    ... ... The appellants' counsel were generous in their acknowledgement of the high standards of fairness which judges routinely apply. The duty of prosecuting counsel, recently considered by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Randall v The Queen [2002] UKPC 19 , [2002] 1 WLR 2237, para 10 , is not to obtain a conviction at all costs but to act as a minister of justice. As Rand J put it in the Supreme Court of Canada in Boucher v The Queen [1955] SCR 16, 24-25 : "Counsel have a duty to see that all available ... ...
  • Bonnett Taylor v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 14 Marzo 2013
    ...463, CA (if a defendant has been denied a fair trial, it would be almost inevitable that the conviction would be regarded as unsafe); Randall v The Queen [2002] 1 WLR 2237, PC (right to a fair trial is absolute, and there would come a point when departure from good practice was so gross, o......
  • DPP of Mauritius v Hurnam
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 25 Abril 2007
    ... ... Prosecuting counsel attacked the respondent vigorously, but in their Lordships' judgment his conduct did not exceed permissible bounds or come near equating with the type of behaviour exemplified by that portrayed in Randall v The Queen [2002] UKPC 19 , [2002] 1 WLR 2237 or Benedetto v The Queen [2003] UKPC 27 , [2003] 1 WLR 1545 , both of which were relied on by the respondent ... 22 The topic which occupied the major part of Mr Guthrie's argument before the Board was an attempt to discredit the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT