Ratnam v Cumarasamy
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1964 |
| Year | 1964 |
| Date | 1964 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
314 cases
-
The "Tokai Maru"
...(1) On the issue whether an extension of time should have been granted, the trial judge's adoption of the approach in Ratnam v Cumarasamy [1965] 1 WLR 8 was rejected as the instant case concerned an application to file an affidavit out of time, and not an application to appeal out of time: ......
- Sitrac Corporation Sdn Bhd v Lim Siew Eng (p)
-
Lim Hwee Meng v Citadel Investment Pte Ltd
... ... Counsel for the appellant sought to rely on the following cases: Ratnam v Cumarasamy & Anor [1965] 1 MLJ 228 , Tan Chai Heng v Yeo Seng Choon [1981] 1 MLJ 271 and Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin [1991] ... ...
- Soda KL Plaza Sdn Bhd v Noble Circle (M) Sdn Bhd
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest of Recent Unreported Commonwealth Caribbean Cases
...Rules of Court regulating the conduct of appeals and adopting the opinion of Lord Guest in the Privy Council decision in R m v Cum my [1964] 3 All ER 933 that "The rules of court must, prima facie, be obeyed, and, in order to justify a court in extending the time during which some step in p......
