Raynor Qui Tam against Fitler
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1797 |
| Date | 01 January 1797 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 83 E.R. 582
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
raynor qui tam against fitler. Debt upon 5 Eliz. for using a trade, brought in the Courts of Westminster. Debt on the statute 5 Eliz. for using a trade at Bristol, and the action was brought in Com. Bane, and tried by Nisi Prius at Bristol; after verdict for the plaintiff, it was moved in arrest of judgment, that the action ought to have been brought at the Assises of Briatol in the proper county, by reason of the statute of 21 Jac. Curia contra. Debt cannot be brought before justices of assise, therefore the statute does not extend to actions of debt; and judgment was given for the plaintiff nisi causa; and then, the (1) English, the 29th Cha. 2, c. 3. Irish, the 7th Wil. 3, c. 12, by which writs of execution shall bind the property of goods, but from the time of their delivery to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Domius R v Kilderby
...4 T. R. 115, 117, Shipman \. Henbest, though the contrary was formerly holden. 1 Vent. 8, Barnes v. Hughes. S. C. 1 Lev. 249. 1 Sid. 400. 3 Lev. 71, Raynor v. Filler. 2 Mod. 246, Forest v. Wise. Freem. 534, Denton v. Wilson,. 4 Mod. 158, King v. Hicks. The method of proceeding upon this sta......
-
Bowyer v Blair
...Morrant v. GoughENR 7 B. & C. 206. Bradly v. Westcott 13 Ves. 445. Reid v. Shergold 10 Ves. 370. Adamson v. Armitage 19 Ves. 418. AnonENR 3 Lev. 71. Jennor v. HardiesENR 1 Lev. 283. Goodtitle v. Otway 2 Wils. 6. Doe d. Herbert v. ThomasENR 3 Ad. & E. 123; S. C. 4 New. & M. 696. Irwin v. Far......
-
88 ER 994
...and agreed, that the words, if true, would subject him to ecclesiastical censure. Sir Peter King thereupon prayed a consultation, and cited 3 Lev. 71, 18. Godb. 446, and 2 Roll. 297. Mr. Solicitor General argued, that defamation, to give the Spiritual Court jurisdiction, must be in respect ......