RB v Calderdale MBC (SEN)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Rowley |
| Neutral Citation | [2022] UKUT 136 (AAC),[2022] UKUT 136 (AAC) |
| Subject Matter | Special educational needs - other,Rowley,A |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
| Published date | 25 May 2022 |
RB v Calderdale MBC (SEN)
[2022] UKUT 136 (AAC)
1
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Appeal No. UA-2021-000608-HS
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER
On appeal from First-tier Tribunal (HESC Chamber)
Between: RB Appellant
- v –
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Respondent
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Rowley
Hearing date: 3 May 2022
Decision date: 11 May 2022
Representation:
Appellant: Ms Emma Waldron, Counsel (acting pro bono), and IPSEA
Respondent: Mr Andrew Cullen, in-house Counsel, Browne Jacobson LLP
ANONYMITY ORDER
Of its own motion the Upper Tribunal orders that, pursuant to rule 14(1) of the Tribunal
Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, there is to be no disclosure of:
(a) The name or address of RB who is the Appellant in these proceedings or
(b) any information that is likely to lead members of the public, directly or
indirectly, to identify the Appellant in connection with these proceedings.
Any breach of this anonymity order is liable to be treated as a contempt of court and
may be punishable by imprisonment, fine or other sanctions under section 25 of the
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. The maximum punishment which may be
imposed is a sentence of two years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine.
DECISION
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal.
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal taken on 20 June 2021, amended and re-issued on
30 June 2021 (ref. EH381/21/00001V), did not involve an error on a point of law. Under
To continue reading
Request your trial