Re Nos. 55 & 57, Holmes Road, Kentish Town.; Beardmore Motors Ltd v Birch Bros. (Properties) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1958
Year1958

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Liberty Mercian Ltd v Cuddy Civil Engineering Ltd (1st Defendant) Cuddy Demolition and Dismantling Ltd (2nd Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 3 September 2013
    ...that the Contract means not A but another real person named B. They rely on Beardmore Motors Ltd. v. Birch Bros. (Properties) Ltd [1959] Ch 298; Davies v Elsby Brothers [1961] 1 WLR 170; Nittan v Solent Steel; Dumford Trading and Gastronome. 64 They also say that in construing a contract it......
  • Davies v Elsby Brothers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 2 November 1960
    ...of a defence that had accrued under the Statute of Limitations. 2The judge was largely guided by the case of Beardmore Motors Limited v. Birch Brothers (Properties) Limited (1959 1 Chancery, page 298). There the applicants had named in their counter-notice under the Landlord and Tenant Act ......
  • Colgate-Palmolive (Asia) Ltd v Swedish East Asia Company Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Federal Court (Singapore)
    • 30 September 1966
    ...period: at [23]. Davies v Elsby Brothers Ltd [1961] 1 WLR 170; [1960] 3 All ER 672 (folld) Nos 55 & 57 Holmes Road, Kentish Town, Re [1959] Ch 298; [1958] 2 All ER 311 (folld) Whittam v WJ Daniel & Co Ltd [1962] 1 QB 271; [1961] 3 All ER 796 (distd) Rules of the Supreme Court1934 , TheO XVI......
  • Payabi and Another v Armstel Shipping Corporation and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 31 January 1992
    ...Ltd. [1977] 1 W.L.R. 185; [1977] 1 All E.R. 398, H.L.(E.) Beardmore Motors Ltd. v. Birch Bros. (Properties) Ltd. [1959] Ch. 298; [1958] 2 W.L.R. 975; [1958] 2 All E.R. 311 Byron v. Cooper (1844) 11 Cl. & Fin. 556, H.L.(E.) Casillo Grani v. Napier Shipping Co. [1984] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 481 E......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1962 Preliminary Sections
    • 11 November 2022
    ...10 Jur. 7; 115 E.R. 823 176 In re: Nos. 55 and 57 Holmes Road, Kentish Town: Beardmore Motors Ltd. v. Birch Bros. (Properties) Ltd., (1958) 2 All E.R. 311; (1959) Ch. 298; (1958) 2 W.L.R. 975; 102 Sol. Jo. 419. 261 Inneh v. Aruegbon, 14 W.A.C.A. 73 138 Inspector-General of Police v. Okoro, ......