Re O (Abduction: Consent and Acquiescence)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Judgment Date | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Year | 1997 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
B v B (Child Abduction)
...through the discretion of the courts or administrative authority where relevant. Re O (Abduction: Consent and Acquiescence)FLR [1997] 1 F.L.R. 924 not followed. Per Lynch J.: Article 13 of the Hague Convention did not apply only as an exception to art. 12, but applied to removals and retent......
-
D.T. v I.B.
...still has, and must exercise, a discretion.’ 40 The Court then referred to some other authorities, including Re O (Abduction: Consent) [1997] 1 F.L.R. 924 and T v. T (Abduction: Consent) [1999] 2 F.L.R. 912, before saying that it preferred the views expressed by the Irish Supreme Court in......
-
Re P (A Child) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
... ... That was later amended by consent on 18 th October 1999 when the mother was granted sole and exclusive custody, the father granted visitation and an order was made that the child ... 30 In Re O [Abduction: Consent and Acquiescence] 1 F.L.R. 924, 940 Bennett J. observed that if Holman J. was stating a principle that consent must always come within Article 13(a), then he ... ...
-
P.F. v C.R
...reference to the recently reported decision of the English High Court, Family Division, in Re O (Abduction: Consent and Acquiescence) [1997] 1 F.L.R. 924. Bennett J. referred to the analysis of the issue of consent in Re C (Abduction: Consent) [1996] 1 F.L.R. 414, and to the judgment of Hol......
Get Started for Free