Re Akerman. Akerman v Akerman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1891 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Re Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander Ltd (No 2)
...go back in time to the origins and development of the equitable rule. The rule was described as follows by Kekewich J in In re Akerman [1891] 3 Ch 212, 219: "A person who owes an estate money, that is to say, who is bound to increase the general mass of the estate by a contribution of his o......
-
Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ((in Administration))
...of an estate against the estate's claim against him as a debtor. Lord Walker cited at [13] the statement of the rule by Kekewich J in In re Akerman [1891] 3 Ch 212 at 219: " A person who owes an estate money, that is to say, who is bound to increase the general mass of the estate by a contr......
-
Brazzill and Others v Willoughby and Others
...members, the mistaken overpayment (through under-deduction) not giving rise to a debt, and that "the equitable principle exemplified by In re Akerman [1891] 3 Ch 212 is not applicable save when the person seeking to obtain benefits due to him from a fund owes a debt to that fund" (see page ......
-
Re SSSL Realisations (2002) Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Another
...to the fund'. That followed a series of authorities, and the authority most often cited is a passage from the judgment of Kekewich J in In re Akerman [[1891] 3 Ch 212, 219]: 'A person who owes an estate money, that is to say, who is bound to increase the general mass of the estate by a cont......
Request a trial to view additional results