Re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas and Pacific Junction Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1891
Date1891

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
154 cases
  • Re Cape Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 June 2006
    ... ... ) which had or may have had inter–company indemnity, agency or business transfer ... properly a member of each class: In re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas and Pacific Junction Railway ... ...
  • Re English, Scottish, and Australian Chartered Bank
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Re Mechala Group Jamaica Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 24 February 2000
    ...laid down in the authorities and in particular the four principles set out in Re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas and Pacific Junction Ry [1891] 1 Ch 213 have been met and that the Court ought to exercise its discretion in favour of confirming the decision made by the creditors. For the aforesai......
  • Re:Ballantyne RE Plc & The Companies Act 2014
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 6 June 2019
    ...quoted with approval from the judgment of Lord Justice Lindley in Re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas and Pacific Junction Railway Company [1891] 1 Ch. 213 and, in particular, he approved the following statement of principle: ‘What the court has to do is to see, first of all, that the provision......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Some comments on the application of the Securities Regulation Code on Takeovers and Mergers
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...(Pty) Ltd (in liquidation) 1993 (1) SA 493 (A) at 508. See also In re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas & Pacific Junction Railway Company [1891] 1 Ch 213 (CA) at 238-239 and 247. 168 See Ex parte Coleman supra note 156 at 187; Du Preez v Garber supra note 91 at 814; Borton v Dundas & Miller supr......
  • 'Mergers'/Amalgamations and Statutory Plans of Arrangement
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Mergers, Acquisitions and Other Changes of Corporate Control. Third Edition
    • 25 June 2020
    ...venerable history. Wegenast refers to the 1891 judgment of Lindley LJ in In re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas and Pacific Junction Ry Co , [1891] 1 ch 213 at 238, in which the court interpreted the arrangement section in the English corporate statute on which the Canadian arrangement provision......