Re Allan. Dow v Cassaigne
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1903 |
| Date | 1903 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
ADG (executor and trustee of the estate of B (alias C), deceased) v ADH and another (D and others, interveners)
...indicate that lapsed gift of residue should be distributed as between the residuary legatees. In re Palmer was followed in In re Allan [1903] 1 Ch 276. 47 There was no intestacy in In re Parker because the testator defined the residuary estate, directed that the lapsed gift would form part ......
-
Humble v Shore
...In re Rhoades, 1885, 29 Ch. D. 142; In re Ballance, 1889, 42 Ch. D. 62. Overruled, In re Palmer [1893], 3 Ch. 369; In re Allan [1903], 1 Ch. 276. [247] humble v. shore. March 12, 13, 16, 1847., [S. C. 1 H. & M. 550, n. Followed, In re Beviss' Trusts, 1872, 26 L. T. 240; In re, Savage's Trus......
-
Bank of Ireland v Conmee
...at some length by Roxburgh, J., in the case of Lybbe, decd., (1954) 1 W.L.R. 573. He refers at p. 578 to the case of Re Allan, decd., (1903) 1 Ch. 276 and accepts that, prima facie, the word "share" does not include an accruing share. He then discusses the difficulty of ascertaining the int......
-
Humble v Shore
...Humble and Shore See the judgment more fully reported, 1 H. & M. 550 (n.). Overruled, In re Palmer, [1893], 3 Ch. 369; In re Allan [1903], 1 Ch. 276, and cases there cited. [119] humble v. shore. Dec. 23, 1842. [See the judgment more fully reported, 1 H. & M. 550 (n.). Overruled, In re Palm......
Request a trial to view additional results