Re Amand (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 23 May 1941 |
| Date | 23 May 1941 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 28 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
B (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2)
...to exercise the power to detain lawfully. In support of this conclusion he drew attention to Mitchell v Mitchinham (1823) 2 D & R 722 and In re Amand [1941] 2 KB 239 which, he observed, demonstrate that the writ of habeas corpus can still issue where a person is on bail. 48 As a matter of l......
-
The Queen (on the application of Seth Kaitey) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...whether the writ of habeas corpus may issue in circumstances where a person is no longer in detention but is on bail: for example, in Re Amand [1941] 2 KB 239, at 249, Viscount Caldecote CJ said that, although the applicant was now on bail, this made no difference and the court had to deal......
-
Lewis v Australian Capital Territory
...212 Ramsay v Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271 Ratcliffe v Evans [1892] 2 QB 524 R (Brooke and another) v Parole Board [2008] 1 WLR 1950 Re Amand [1941] 2 KB 239 Re Application for Bail by Islam [2010] ACTSC 147 ; 4 ACTLR 235. Rechichi v Parole Board of Western Australia [2001] WASC 363 Re......
-
Guy Jane v Westminster Magistrates' Court
...Applicant is on bail and not in actual custody is not fatal to an application for habeas corpus. There is old authority to that effect: see Re Amand [1941] 2 KB 239, at 249 (Viscount Caledcote CJ). There are also more recent statements to similar effect: see R v Secretary of State for the ......
Request a trial to view additional results