RE O and J (Paternity: Blood Tests)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
LG v DK
...2 FLR 188. O, Re, Re J (children) (blood tests: constraint)[2000] 1 FCR 330, [2000] 2 All ER 29, [2000] Fam 139, [2000] 2 WLR 1284, [2000] 1 FLR 418. P, Re [2009] EWHC 163 (Ch), [2009] 2 All ER 1198, [2010] Ch 33, Ct of SC (a minor) (adoption: freeing order), Re[1999] 1 FCR 145, sub nom Re ......
-
Re F (Children) (DNA Evidence)
...considered this point, though in a different context in Re O (Minor)(Blood Tests: Constraint); Re J (Minor) (Blood Tests: Constraint [2000] 1 FLR 418, he held that Part 3 of the 1969 Act entirely overrode both the inherent jurisdiction to direct the testing of a child to establish paternity......
-
Re H and A (Children)
...2 FLR 65, CA. O, Re J (children) (blood tests: constraint), Re[2000] 1 FCR 330, [2000] Fam 139, [2000] 2 All ER 29, [2000] 2 WLR 1284, [2000] 1 FLR 418. S v McC, W v W [1972] AC 24, [1970] 3 All ER 107, [1970] 3 WLR 366, CA. Serio v Serio (1983) 4 FLR T (a child) (DNA tests: paternity), Re[......
-
Re H and A (Children) (Paternity: Blood Tests)
...for the sample to be taken. 2 This small but significant amendment effectively reversed the effect of the decision of Wall J in Re O and J (Paternity: Blood Test) [2000] 1 FLR 418. Judge Elystan Morgan's decision concluded a five day trial that had commenced on 13 September, continued on 2......
Request a trial to view additional results