Re Y and K (Split Hearing: Evidence)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2003 |
| Date | 2003 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Re X (Children) (Disclosure for Purposes of Criminal Proceedings)
...to give oral evidence. Pointing to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Re Y and K (Split Hearing: Evidence) [2003] EWCA Civ 669, [2003] 2 FLR 273, they correctly submitted that the Defendant was a compellable witness, that he had no right to refuse to give evidence and that by virtue of ......
-
Q v Q
...the first three questions would be reasonably clear. He would be compellable: Re Y and K (Split Hearing: Evidence) [2003] EWCA Civ 669, [2003] 2 FLR 273. He would not be able to plead the privilege against self-incrimination: section 98(1) of the 1989 Act. His evidence would not be "admissi......
-
In the matter of L1 and L2 [Care Proceedings: Criminal Trial]
...a compellable witness with no right to refuse to give evidence or refuse to answer questions which might incriminate her. In Re Y and K (2003) 2 FLR 273 at paragraph 34 Hale LJ said: 4 “We are glad, therefore, to have the opportunity today of clarifying the situation. Parents can be compell......
-
County Council v Y and Another
...learned from it. 2 The case is the same case that has already been reported as Re Y and K (Split hearing: evidence) [2003] EWCA Civ 669, [2003] 2 FLR 273 following an earlier appeal to the Court of Appeal. 3 The essential history is as follows. A mother has a daughter, T, who was born in Ap......
2 books & journal articles
-
The Self-Incrimination Privilege in Care Proceedings and the Criminal Trial and ‘Shall Not Be Admissible in Evidence’
...175–87.34 [2003] EWCA Civ 669, [2003] 3 FCR 240.35 Ibid. at [35].36 Re Y and K (Split Hearing: Evidence) [2003] EWCA Civ 669, [2003] 2 FLR 273 at[33].37 [2006] EWHC 372 (Fam).The Self-incrimination Privilege in Care Proceedings and the Criminal Trial55 So how far does the promise of protect......
-
Interpreting the Threshold Criteria under section 31(2) of the Children Act 1989 – the House of Lords decision in Re B1
...Re S (Care Proceedings: SplitHearing) [1996 ] 2 FLR 773 ; ReY & K (Children) (Care proc eedings: splithearing)[20 03] EWCA 669, [2003] 2 FLR 273.49 Re G [2001] 1 FLR 822; Practice Direction ^ JudicialContinuity[2 003] 3 All ER 6 03.Interpreting the Threshold Criteria u nder s ection 31(2)47......