Re Andrabell Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1984
Date1984

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Hunter v Moss
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 January 1994
  • Equipment Dynamics Sdn Bhd and other appeals; Geh Cheng Hooi and Others
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Helen Elizabeth Batt v Hugh Charles Boswell
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 25 March 2022
    ...6 Ch App 632; Henry v Hammond [1913] 2 KB 515 at 521; Re Tilley's Will Trusts [1967] Ch 1179; Re Bond Worth Ltd [1980] Ch 228; Re Andrabell Ltd [1984] 3 All ER 407; and Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102, HL. None of those decided before 1964 is cited by the 16 th edition in this context. I ......
  • Shalson and Others v Russo and Others; Mimran and Another (Part 20 Claimants)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 July 2003
    ...with any loans which Mr Russo made in accordance with the initial agreement, points away from any intention to create a trust: see In re Andrabell Ltd [1984] 3 All ER 407, at 415–416, per Peter Gibson J; and R v Clowes (No 2) [1994] 2 All ER 316, at 325–326, per Watkins LJ. In Quistclose,......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • BOOK DEBT FINANCING1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1993, December 1993
    • 1 December 1993
    ...Bond Worth[1979] 3 W L R 629; Borden v Scottish Timber Products[1979] W L R 672; Re Peachdart Ltd[1983] 3 All E R 204; Re Andrabell Ltd[1984] 3 All E R 407 and Pfeiffer Weinkellerei-Weineinkauf v Arbuthnot Factors Ltd[1988] 1 W L R 150. The latest decision highlighting this trend is Re Weld......
  • VISITING AN OLD FRIEND — THE “ROMALPA” CLAUSE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 December 1997
    ...Industrie Vaasen BV v Romalpa Aluminium Ltd [1976] 1 WLR 676, at 686. See also Re Bond Worth Ltd[1980] Ch 228, at 263; Re Andrabell Ltd[1984] 3 All ER 407, at 415; Re Peachdart Ltd[1984] Ch 131, at 142. 57 Re Bond Worth [1980] Ch 228, at 256—261. 58 Aluminium Industrie Vaasen BV v Romalpa A......